Are peer and social influences important components to include in HIV-STD prevention models? Results of a survey on young people at Lund University, Sweden

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 203-211

  Svenson, Gary R ^a,b   Hanson, Bertil S ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Condom use; HIV prevention; Social influences; Survey; University students

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001049941     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/6.3.203     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. WHO. AIDS Series 5: guide to planning health promotion for AIDS prevention and control. Geneva: WHO, 1989.
2. Hooykaas C, van der Linden MMD, van Doorman GJJ, van Velde FW, van der Plight J, Coutinho RA. Limited changes in sexual behaviour of heterosexual men and women with multiple partners in The Netherlands. AIDS Care 1991;3(1):21-9.
3. Dommeyer C, Marquard J, Gibson R, Taylor R. The effectiveness of an AIDS educational campaign on a college campus. J Am College Hlth 1989;38(3):131-5.
4. Linded C, Allen S, Carael M, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and perceived risk of AIDS among Rwanda women: relationship to HIV infection and behaviour change. AIDS 1991;5:993-1002.
5. Tones R. Selecting indicators of success in health education: importance of theory and philosophy. Helsinki: Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, 1988.
6. Romer D, Hornik R. HIV education for youth: the importance of social consensus in behaviour change. AIDS Care 1992;4(3):285-303.
7. Turner JC. Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1988.
8. Ortner SB, Whitehead H. Accounting for sexual meanings. In: Ortner SB, Whitehead H, editors. Sexual meanings: the cultural construction of gender and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981:1-27.
9. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1983.
10. Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Brasfield TL, Stevenson Y, Diaz YE, Hauth AC. AIDS risk behaviour patterns among gay men in southern cities. Am J Public Hlth 1990;80(4):416-8.
11. Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Brasfield TL, Lemke A, Amidei T, Roffman RE. Psychological factors that predict AIDS high-risk versus AIDS precautionary behaviour. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990;58(1):117-20.
12. Wallston KA, Wallston BS, Devillis R. Development of the multi-dimensional health locus of control (MLOC) scales. Hlth Educ Monogr 1978;6(2):160-70.
13. Breckler SJ, Greenwald AG. Motivational facets of the self. In: Sorrentino RM, Higgens ET, editors. Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behaviour. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1986:145-62.
14. Kallings LO, Wignell H. Studier av HIV och andra sexuellt överförbara infektioner i Sverige (Studies of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases in Sweden). In: Kallings LO, Wignell H, editors. HIV-AIDS forskningen (HIV-AIDS research). Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadens Forskningsaktiebolag, 1993:14-20.
15. Smith TW. A methodological review of the sexual behaviour questions on the 1988 General Social Survey (GSS). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, 1988.
16. Coyle SL, Borouch RF, Turner CF. Evaluating AIDS prevention campaigns. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
17. Schaalma H, Kok G, Peters L. Determinants of consistent condom use by adolescents: the impact of experience and sexual intercourse. Hlth Educ Res 1993;8(2):255-69.
18. Parringer L, Phillips KA, Hu TW. Who seeks HIV testing? The impact of risk, knowledge, and state regulatory policy on the testing decision. Inquiry 1991;28(3):226-35.
19. Phillips KA. Subjective knowledge of AIDS and use of HIV testing. Am J Public Hlth 1993;83(10):1460-2.
20. McGuire LW. Attitudes and attitude change. In: Linsey G, Aronson E, editors. The handbook of social psychology, vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1964.
21. Bandura A. Perceived efficacy in the exercise of control over Aids-infection. Eval Prog Plan 1990;13:9-17.