Two point observation of magnetopause motion: The INTERBALL project

Advances in Space Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4-5, 1997, Pages 801-807

  Safrankova J ^a   Nemecek Z ^a   Prech L ^a   Zastenker, G ^b   Fedorov, A ^b   Romanov, S ^b   Sibeck, D ^c   Simunek J ^d  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b Russian Academy of Sciences   (Russian Federation)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001046527     PISSN: 02731177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00512-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aubry, M. P., C. T. Russell, and M. G. Kivelson. Inward motion of the magnetopause before a substorm, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 7018 (1970).
2. Aubry, M. P., M. G. Kivelson, and C. T. Russell, Motion and structure of the magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 1673 (1971).
3. Fairfield, D. H., Average and unusual locations of the Earth's magnetopause and bow shock, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6700 (1971).
4. Fairfield, D. H., W. Baumjohann, G. Paschmann, H. Luehr, and D. G. Sibeck, Upstream pressure variations associated with the bow shock and their effects on the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 3773 (1990).
5. Fitzenreiter, R. J., and K. W. Ogilvie, Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetopause: Observations, in: Physics of the Magnetopause, ed. by P. Song et al., 90, 277-284 (1995).
6. Formisano, V., V. Domingo, and K.-P. Wenzel, The three-dimensional shape of the magnetopause, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 1137 (1979).
7. Holzer, R. E., and J. A. Slavin, Magnetic flux transfer associated with expansions and contractions of the dayside magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 3831 (1978).
8. Howe, H. C., Jr., and J. H. Binsack, Explorer 33 and 35 plasma observations of magnetosheath flow, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3334 (1972).
9. Nemecek, Z., A. Fedorov, J. Safrankova, G. Zastenker, Structure of the low-latitude magnetopause: MAGION 4 observations, Annales Geophys., in print (1996a).
10. Nemecek, Z., J. Safrankova, G. Zastenker, P. Triska, Multipoint study of the solar wind: INTERBALL contribution to the topic, Adv. Space Res., this issue (1996b).
11. Petrinec, S. P., P. Song, and C. T. Russell, Solar cycle variations in the size and shape of the magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 7893 (1991).
12. Petrinec, S. P., and C. T. Russell, An empirical model of the size and shape of the near-Earth magnetotail, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2695 (1993).
13. Z and solar wind dynamic pressure, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 21421 (1993).
14. Russell, C. T., and R. C. Elphic, Initial ISEE magnetometer results: Magnetopause observations, Space Sci. Rev., 22, 681 (1978).
15. Russell, C. T., The structure of the magnetopause, Physics of the Magnetopause, ed. by P. Song et al., 90, 81-98 (1995).
16. Safrankova, J., G. Zastenker, Z. Nemecek, A. Fedorov, M. Simersky, L. Prech, Small scale observation of the magnetopause motion: Preliminary results of the INTERBALL project, Annales Geophys., in print.
17. Sibeck, D. G., et al., The magnetospheric response to 8-minute-period strong-amplitude upstream pressure variations, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 2505 (1989).
18. Sibeck, D. G., R. L. Lepping, and A. J. Lazarus, Magnetic field line draping in the plasma depletion layer, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 2433 (1990).
19. Sibeck, D. G., R. E. Lopez, E. C. Roelof, Solar wind control of the magnetopause shape, location, and motion, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5489 (1991).