The effect of audit seniors' decisions on working paper documentation and on partners' decisions

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 155-171

  Ricchiute, David N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001045408     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00029-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Wright, A. (1987). An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgments. The Accounting Review, 1-13.
2. Anon (1988). Statement on auditing standards No. 59: the auditor's consideration of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
3. Asare, S. K., & McDaniel, L. S. (1996). The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. The Accounting Review, 139-159.
4. Choo F., & Trotman, K. T. (1991). The relationship between knowledge structure and judgments for experienced and inexperienced auditors. The Accounting Review, 464-485.
5. Cushing, B.E., & Loebbecke, J. K. (1986). Comparison of Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms. AAA.
6. Dellarosa, D., & Bourne Jr, L. E. (1984). Decisions and memory: differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidence. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 669-682.
7. Earley, P.C., Wojnaroski, P., & Prest, W. (1987). Task planning and energy expended: exploration of how goals influence performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107-114.
8. Gardiner, J.M., & Tulving, E. (1980). Exceptions to recognition failure of recallable words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 194-209.
9. Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 691-702.
10. Kennedy, J. (1993). Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: a framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research, 231-245.
11. Koonce, L., Anderson, U., & Marchant, G. (1995). Justification of decisions in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 369-384.
12. Libby, R., & Trotman, K. T. (1993). The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 559-574.
13. Moeckel, C.L., & Plumlee, R. D. (1989). Auditors' confidence in recognition of audit evidence. The Accounting Review, 653-666.
14. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 521-533.
15. Ramsey, R. J. (1994). Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 127-135.
16. Ricchiute, D. N. (1992). Working paper order effects and auditors' going-concern decisions. The Accounting Review, 46-58.
17. Rich, J.S., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (1997). The audit review process: a characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 481-505.
18. Singh, S.N., Rothschild, M. L., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1988). Recognition versus recall as measures of television commercial forgetting. Journal of Marketing Research, 72-80.
19. Swieringa, R.J., & Weick, K. E. (1982). An assessment of laboratory experiments in accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement, 56-101.
20. Tan, H. (1995). Effects of expectations, prior involvement, and review awareness on memory for audit evidence and judgment. Journal of Accounting Research, 113-135.
21. Trotman, K.T., & Yetton, P. W. (1985). The effect of the review process on auditor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 256-267.