Exploring social structure using dynamic three-dimensional color images

Social Networks

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 109-118

  Freeman, Linton C ^a   Webster, Cynthia M ^b   Kirke, Deirdre M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001027033     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00016-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arabie, P., Hubert, L.J., De Soete, G. (Eds.), 1996. Clustering and Classification. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.
2. Blau, P.M., Duncan, O.D., 1967. The American Occupational Structure. Wiley, New York.
3. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. UCINET IV network analysis software. Connections. 15:1992;12-15.
4. Brewer D. Patterns in the recall of persons in the department of a formal organization. J. Quant. Anthropol. 5:1995;255-284.
5. Caldwell M.A., Peplau L.A. Sex differences in same sex friendship. Sex Roles. 8:1982;721-732.
6. Coombs G. Networks and exchange: the role of social relationships in a small voluntary association. J. Anthropol. Res. 29:1973;96-112.
7. Feiring C., Coates D. Social networks and gender differences in the life space of opportunity: introduction. Sex Roles. 17:1987;611-620.
8. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., Back, K., 1963. Social Pressures in Informal Groups: a Study of Human Factors in Housing. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford.
9. Freeman L.C. Expectations in a social network: the small world of Bochner, Buker, and McLeod revisited. Connections. 3:1979;89-91.
10. Galison, P., 1997. Image and Logic: a Material Culture of Microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 37:1992;422-447.
12. Ibarra H. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Acad. Manage. Rev. 18:1993;56-87.
13. Kamada T., Kawai S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Lett. 31:1989;7-15.
14. Kirke D.M. Collecting peer data and delineating peer networks in a complete network. Soc. Networks. 18:1996;333-346.
15. Krackhardt, D., Blythe, J., McGrath, C., 1995. KrackPlot 3.0 User's Manual. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
16. Kruskal, J.B., Wish, M., 1978. Multidimensional Scaling. Sage, Beverly Hills.
17. Nakao K. Analyzing sociometric preferences: an example of Japanese and US business groups. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2:1987;523-534.
18. Priest R.F., Sawyer J. Proximity and peership: bases of balance in interpersonal attraction. Am. J. Sociol. 72:1967;633-649.
19. Richardson D.C., Richardson J.S. The Kinmage - a tool for scientific communication. Protein Sci. 1:1992;3-9.
20. Romney A.K., Weller S.C. Predicting informant accuracy from patterns of recall among individuals. Soc. Networks. 6:1984;59-77.
21. Webster C.M. Detecting context-based constraints in social perception. J. Quant. Anthropol. 5:1995;285-303.
22. Weller, S.C., Romney, A.K., 1990. Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills.
23. Wilkinson, L., 1989. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Chicago.