Spectrum of the Fokker-Planck operator representing diffusion in a random velocity field

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 196-203

  Chalker, J T ^a   Wang, Z Jane ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREEN'S FUNCTION; VELOCITY;

EIGENVALUE DENSITIES; FOKKER PLANCK OPERATOR; MEAN FIELD APPROXIMATION; MEAN-SQUARE DISPLACEMENT; RANDOM VELOCITY FIELDS; SELF-CONSISTENT BORN APPROXIMATION; SPECTRAL PROPERTIES; TIME INDEPENDENTS;

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS;

EID: 0001013388     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.196     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. M. B. Isichenko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 961 (1992).
2. G. I. Taylor, Proc. London Math. Soc. 20, 196 (1921).
3. L. F. Richardson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 110, 709 (1926).
4. G. K. Batchelor, Auts. J. Sci. Res. 2, 437 (1949)
5. G. K. BatchelorProc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48, 345 (1952).
6. R. H. Kraichnan, Phys. Fluids 11, 945 (1968)
7. R. H. KraichnanPhys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1016 (1994)
8. Phys. Rev. Lett.K. Gawedzki and A. Kupiainen, 75, 3834 (1995)
9. M. Chertkov, G. Falkovich, I. Kolokolov, and V. Lebedev, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4924 (1995).
10. Ia. Sinai, in Proceedings of the Berlin Conference in Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by R. Schrader et al. (Springer, Berlin, 1982), p. 12.
11. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. A 30, 960 (1984)
12. Phys. Rev. AD. S. Fisher, Z. Qiu, S. J. Shenker, and S. H. Shenker, 31, 3841 (1985).
13. J. A. Aronovitz and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1948 (1984).
14. V. E. Kravtsov, I. V. Lerner, and V. I. Yudson, J. Phys. A 18, L703 (1985)
15. V. E. KravtsovI. V. LernerV. I. YudsonZh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 91, 569 (1996) [Sov. Phys. JETP 64, 336 (1986)]
16. V. E. KravtsovI. V. LernerV. I. YudsonPhys. Lett. A 119, 203 (1986)
17. I. V. Lerner, Nucl. Phys. A 560, 274 (1993).
18. M. W. Deem and D. Chandler, J. Stat. Phys. 76, 911 (1994)
19. M. W. Deem, Phys. Rev. E 51, 4319 (1995).
20. S. Alexandar, J. Bernasconi, W. R. Schneider, and R. Orbach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 175 (1981).
21. J. P. Bouchaud and A. Georges, Phys. Rep. 195, 127 (1990).
22. M. Avellaneda and A. J. Majda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 753 (1989)
23. M. AvellanedaA. J. MajdaCommun. Math. Phys. 131, 381 (1990)
24. Commun. Math. Phys.M. AvellanedaA. J. Majda138, 339 (1991).
25. A. Fannjiang and G. C. Papanicolaou, Prob. Theor. Relat. Fields 105, 279 (1996)
26. A. FannjiangG. C. PapanicolaouJ. Stat. Phys. 88, 1033 (1997).
27. D. W. Strook and S. R. S. Varadhan, Multidimensional Diffusion Process (Springer, Berlin, 1963).
28. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Spring-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).
29. E. Tosatti, M. Zannetti, and L. Pietronero, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 73, 161 (1988).
30. J. Miller and Z. J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1461 (1996).
31. J. Ginibre, J. Math. Phys. 6, 440 (1965).
32. V. L. Girko, Theor. Probab. Appl. 29, 694 (1985).
33. H. J. Sommers, A. Crisanti, H. Sompolinsky, and Y. Stein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1895 (1988).
34. N. Lehmann and H. J. Sommers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 941 (1991).
35. J. Feinberg and A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. B 504, 579 (1997).
36. K. B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 491 (1997)
37. K. B. EfetovPhys. Rev. B 56, 9630 (1997).
38. J. T. Chalker and Z. J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1797 (1997).
39. R. A. Janik, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4100 (1997)
40. R. A. Janik, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp, J. Wambach, and I. Zahed, Nucl. Phys. B 501, 603 (1997).
41. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)
42. N. HatanoD. R. NelsonPhys. Rev. B 56, 8651 (1997).
43. A. V. Izyumov and B. D. Simons, e-print cond-mat/9811260.
44. C. Mudry, B. D. Simons, and A. Altland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4257 (1998).
45. See, for example, A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gorkov, and I. E. Dzyaloshinski, Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics (Dover, New York, 1975).
46. In this paper, we use the more symmetric form (Formula presented) in preference to our previous convention, (Formula presented) 25.