SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

10
- 4243958963
- We no longer support the mechanism for the quenching of the Hall effect proposed in this paper, in view of the recent exact numerical results of
- (1989) Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol.62 , pp. 1780
- Ravenhall, D.G.¹ Wyld, H.W.² Schult, R.L.³

11
- 30244451196
- (1989) Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol.62 , pp. 2527
- Avishai, Y.¹ Band, Y.B.²

16
- 84931496503
- Ravenhall, Wyld, and Schult, Ref. 7; Avishai and Band, Ref. 7; Kirczenow, Ref. 7.

20
- 84931537131
- edited by, M. A. Reed, W. P. Kirk, (Academic, New York, to be published)
- ``Nanostructure Physics and Fabrication,''
- Timp, G.¹

23
- 0024718802
- We only find the overshoot in RB, observed in Refs. 13 and 14, for rounded corners. This explains the near absence of the effect in the calculation of
- (1989) Solid State Commun. , vol.71 , pp. 469
- Kirczenow, G.¹

24
- 33749406012
- Four-Terminal Phase-Coherent Conductance
- (1986) Physical Review Letters , vol.57 , pp. 1761
- Büttiker, M.¹

25
- 84931496483
- The reason that attachment of the hard-wall, field-free leads (shaded in Fig. 1, right inset) does not change the resistances in the semiclassical limit is that trajectories approaching from the unshaded part of the lead are not reflected at the interface with the shaded part. From the relation Ti-> j (B) = Tj-> i (-B) (Ref. 16), together with Eq. (2), it then follows that all coefficients in Eq. (1) and hence all resistances remain unchanged.

26
- 84931496484
- C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, in ``Electronic Properties of Multilayers and Low-Dimensional Semiconductor Structures,'' edited by J. M. Chamberlain, L. Eaves, and J. C. Portal, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series (Plenum, London, to be published).

27
- 84931496477
- In this connection we mention the large irregular fluctuations which we found in the B dependence of R12,65 (see Ref. 18). This resistance involves the voltage difference over a junction through which no net current flows, and presumably the fluctuations result from ``chaotic'' multiple scattering in the junction region.

28
- 84931496478
- In Refs. 1 and 2, a camel-back–shaped longitudinal magnetoresistance was reported. There a small amount of diffuse boundary scattering (not included in the present calculation) is the dominant mechanism for the effect, as demonstrated recently by T. J. Thornton, M. L. Roukes, A. Scherer, and B. van der Gaag (unpublished).

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.