Nonperturbative theory of projectile-electron loss in fast collisions with heavy atomic targets

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 2794-2803

  Voitkiv, A B ^a   Sigaud, G M ^a   Montenegro, E C ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000990977     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2794     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. H. McGuire, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, 217 (1992).
2. J. H. McGuire, Electron Correlation Dynamics in Atomic Collisions (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997), Secs. 1–10.
3. N. Stolterfoht, R. D. DuBois, and R. D. Rivarola, Electron Emission in Heavy Ion-Atom Collisions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997), Chaps. 1–8.
4. M. M. Sant’Anna, E. C. Montenegro, and J. H. McGuire, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2148 (1998).
5. C. D. Lin, in Two-Center Effects in Ion-Atom Collisions, Symposium in Honor of M. Eugene Rudd, Lincoln, NE, edited by T. J. Gay and A. F. Starace, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 362 (AIP, New York, 1996), 135–146.
6. E. C. Montenegro, W. E. Meyerhof, and J. H. McGuire, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, 249 (1994).
7. M. M. Sant’Anna, W. S. Melo, A. C. F. Santos, G. M. Sigaud, E. C. Montenegro, M. B. Shah, and W. E. Meyerhof, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1204 (1998).
8. I. S. Dmitriev and V. S. Nikolaev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 44, 660 (1963) [Sov. Phys. JETP 17, 447 (1963)].
9. D. R. Bates, V. Dose, and N. A. Young, J. Phys. B 2, 930 (1969).
10. H. R. J. Walters, J. Phys. B 8, L54 (1975).
11. K. Riesselmann, L. W. Anderson, L. Durand, and C. J. Anderson, Phys. Rev. A 43, 5934 (1991).
12. P. L. Grande, G. Schiwietz, G. M. Sigaud, and E. C. Montenegro, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2983 (1996).
13. E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1970), p. 486.
14. A. M. Dykhne and G. L. Yudin, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 125, 377 (1978) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 21, 549 (1978)].
15. Neglect of the factors (Formula presented) makes time integrals like the one that appears in Eq. (27) diverge. However, the diverging part of these integrals is independent of the electron coordinates. Therefore, the transition matrix elements for excitation and ionization are finite.
16. F. Salvat, J. D. Martinez, R. Mayol, and J. Parellada, Phys. Rev. A 36, 467 (1987).
17. M. M. SantAnna, W. S. Melo, A. C. F. Santos, G. M. Sigaud, and E. C. Montenegro, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 99, 46 (1995).
18. A. C. F. Santos, W. S. Melo, M. M. Sant’Anna, G. M. Sigaud, and E. C. Montenegro (unpublished).
19. R. D. DuBois and S. T. Manson, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2007 (1987).
20. J. M. Hansteen, O. M. Johnsen, and L. Kocbach, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 15, 315 (1975).
21. E. C. Montenegro and W. E. Meyerhof, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2289 (1991).