Unoccupied electronic structure of (formula presented)

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 19, 1999, Pages 13413-13417

  Domke, M ^d   Kaindl, G ^d   Uchida, S ^c   Kielwein, M ^a   Sing, M ^a   Hu, Z ^a   Knupfer, M ^a   Golden, M S ^a   Fink, J ^a  

^a IFW DRESDEN   (Germany)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000982853     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.13413     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. E. Dagotto and T.M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996).
2. R. Neudert, J. Málek, H. Rosner, M. Kielwein, Z. Hu, M. Knupfer, M.S. Golden, J. Fink, N. Nücker, M. Merz, S. Schuppler, N. Motoyama, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. Domke, and G. Kaindl, S.-L. Drechsler (unpublished).
3. M. Uehara, T. Nagata, J. Akimitsu, H. Takahashi, N. Mori, and K. Kinoshita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 2764 (1996).
4. J.B. Goodenough, Phys. Rev. 100, 564 (1955);
5. J. Kanamori, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87 (1959).
6. Y. Mizuno, T. Tohyama, S. Maekawa, T. Osafune, N. Motoyama, H. Eisaki, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 57, 5326 (1998).
7. F. Sapina, J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, M.J. Sanchis, R. Ibanez, A. Beltran, and D. Beltran, Solid State Commun. 74, 779 (1990).
8. M. Domke, T. Mandel, A. Puschmann, C. Xue, D.A. Shirley, G. Kaindl, H. Petersen, and P. Kuske, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 80 (1992).
9. A core-level excitation whose absorption coefficient is small compared to the total absorption, as is the case for the O (Formula presented) edge, leads to a very poor signal-to-background ratio in TEY, but has the distinct advantage that self-absorption effects in the FY mode remain small. The situation is just reversed in the case of the relatively strong Cu (Formula presented) absorption.
10. L.H. Tjeng, C.T. Chen, and S.W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. B 45, 8205 (1992).
11. J. Jaklevic, J.A. Kirby, M.P. Klein, and A.S. Robertson, Solid State Commun. 23, 679 (1977);
12. L. Tröger, D. Arvanitis, K. Baberschke, H. Michaelis, U. Grimm, and E. Zschech, Phys. Rev. B 46, 3283 (1992).
13. The spectra for (Formula presented) were obtained by extrapolation from measurements at grazing incidence (Formula presented) off the sample surface normal).
14. For an overview, see J. Fink, N. Nücker, E. Pellegrin, H. Romberg, M. Alexander, and M. Knupfer, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 66, 395 (1994).
15. H. Eschrig, Optimized LCAO Method (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).
16. H. Rosner, R. Hayn, and J. Schulenburg, Phys. Rev. B 57, 13 660 (1998).
17. Transitions into unoccupied Cu (Formula presented) orbitals are also allowed, but show a reduced transition probability by a factor of 20 compared to Cu (Formula presented) final states: B.K. Teo and P.A. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 2815 (1979).
18. In the evaluation of the spectral weight, different matrix elements for transitions into Cu (Formula presented) and Cu (Formula presented) states were taken into account.
19. S. Haffner, R. Neudert, M. Kielwein, M. Knupfer, M.S. Golden, K. Ruck, G. Krabbes, J. Fink, H. Rosner, R. Hayn, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, Z. Hu, M. Domke, and G. Kaindl, Phys. Rev. B 57, 3672 (1998).
20. H. Rosner, R. Hayn, and S.-L. Drechsler, Physica B 259-261, 1001 (1999).
21. R. Weht and W.E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2502 (1998).
22. H. Rosner, H. Eschrig, R. Hayn, S.-L. Drechsler, and J. Málek, Phys. Rev. B 56, 3402 (1997).
23. G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics (Plenum, New York, 1993), pp. 293–298 and 303–304.
24. Z.-X. Shen and J.R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1771 (1997).