The MNDOC Method, a Correlated Version of the MNDO Model

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 1981, Pages 1413-1420

  Thiel, Walter ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000950294     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja00396a021     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pople, J. A.; Segal, G. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 44, 3289.
2. Bingham, R. C.; Dewar, M. J. S.; Lo, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1285.
3. Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4899.
4. Roothaan, C. C. J. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1951, 23, 69.
5. Hall, G. G. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1951, 205, 541.
6. Schaefer, H. F., III, Ed. “Modern Theoretical Chemistry. Electronic Structure Theory”; Plenum Press: New York, 1977; Vol. 3.
7. Shavitt, I. Reference 6; Chapter 6.
8. Roos, B. O.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. Reference 6; Chapter 7.
9. Meyer, W. Reference 6; Chapter 11.
10. Kutzelnigg, W. Reference 6; Chapter 5.
11. Freed, K. F. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1971, 22, 313.
12. Bartlett, R. J.; Silver, D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 3258.
13. Claverie, P.; Diner, S.; Malrieu, J. P. Ini. J. Quantum Chem. 1967, 1, 751.
14. Ostlund, N. S.; Bowen, M. F. Theor. Chim. Acta 1976, 40, 175.
15. Pople, J. A.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R. Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1976, 10, 1.
16. Hase, H. L.; Lauer, G.; Schulte, K.-W.; Schweig, A. Theor. Chim. Acta 1978, 48, 47.
17. Lauer, G.; Schulte, K.-W.; Schweig, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 4925.
18. Davidson, E. R. In “The World of Quantum Chemistry”; Daudel, R., Pullman, B., Eds.; Reidel: Dordrecht, 1974.
19. Meller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618.
20. Epstein, P. S. Phys. Rev. 1926, 28, 695.
21. Nesbet, R. K. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1955, 230, 312, 322.
22. Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. Theor. Chim. Acta 1977, 46, 89.
23. Roothaan, C. C. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1951, 19, 1445.
24. The MNDO energy may change very slightly during a rotation (typically by 0.01 kcal/mol) since the symmetry relations mentioned are not fulfilled. In practice, this does not matter in geometry optimizations, due to the geometry conventions in the standard programs, e.g.: Thiel, W. QCPE 1978, II, 353.
25. Bartlett, R. J.; Shavitt, I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 50, 190.
26. Davidson, E. R.; Silver, D. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 52, 403.
27. Siegbahn, P. E. M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1978, 55, 386.
28. Davidson, E. R. In “Energy, Structure and Reactivity”; Smith, D. W., McRae, W. B., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1973.
29. Wilkinson, J. H. “The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem”; Oxford University Press: London, 1965; Chapter 5.
30. Davidson, E. R. J. Comput. Phys. 1975, 17, 87.
31. Mclver, J. W.; Komornicki, A. Chem. Phys. Letters 1971, 10, 303.
32. Pulay, P. In “Modern Theoretical Chemistry. Electronic Structure Theory”; Schaefer, H. F., III, Ed.; Plenum Press; New York, 1977; Vol. 4, Chapter 4.
33. Lauer, G.; Schulte, K.-W.; Schweig, A.; Thiel, W. Theor. Chim. Acta 1979, 52, 319.
34. Weiner, P. K., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 1975.
35. DeFrees, D. J.; Levi, B. A.; Pollack, S. K.; Flehre, W. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Pople, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4085.
36. Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4907.
37. Khachkuruzov, G. A.; Przhevaliskii, I. N. Opt. Spectrosc. (Engl. Transl.) 1974, 36, 172.
38. Hunt, R. H.; Leacock, R. A.; Peters, C. W.; Hecht, K. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 42, 1931.
39. Pople, J. A.; Binkley, J. S. Mol. Phys. 1975, 29, 599.
40. Lowdin, P.-O. Ado. Chem. Phys. 1959, 2, 207.