Pairing in the Hubbard model: The Cu5O4 cluster versus the Cu-O plane

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 269-280

  Cini, M ^a   Balzarotti, A ^a   Stefanucci, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000948760     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100510050129     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Y. Tokura, M. Takagi, S. Uchida, Nature 337, 345 (1989).
2. G. Calestani, in High Temperature Superconductivity, Proceedings of the 1994 GNSM School, edited by M. Acquarone (Word Scientific, Singapore, 1994), p. 1.
3. Ch. Renner, B. Revaz, K. Kadowski, I. Maggio-Aprile, Ø. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3606 (1998) and references therein.
4. For a review, see D.J. van Harlingen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 515 (1995); D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rep. 250, 329 (1995).
5. For a review, see D.J. van Harlingen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 515 (1995); D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rep. 250, 329 (1995).
6. 1 get exchanged.
7. M. Cini, A. Balzarotti, Solid State Commun. 101, 671 (1997).
8. A.K. McMahan, R.M. Martin, S. Satpathy, Phys. Rev. B 38, 6650 (1988).
9. M.S. Hybertsen, E.B. Stechel, M. Schluter, D.R. Jennison, Phys. Rev. B 41, 11068 (1990).
10. N.E. Bickers, D.J. Scalapino, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989): N.E. Bickers, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. B 43, 8044 (1991).
11. N.E. Bickers, D.J. Scalapino, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989): N.E. Bickers, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. B 43, 8044 (1991).
12. G. Esirgen, N.E. Bickers, Phys. Rev. B 57, 5376 (1998) and references therein.
13. T. Dahm, L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 793 (1995).
14. J. Schmalian, D. Pines, B. Stojković, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3839 (1998).
15. R. Citro, M. Marinaro, Z. Phys. B 103, 153 (1997).
16. R. Citro, M. Marinaro, Solid State Commun. 106, 745 (1998).
17. R. Citro, M. Marinaro (to be published).
18. The t - j model, which is basically a large-U case of the Hubbard model, also leads to pairing, see e.g. O.P. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9988 (1996) and reference therein.
19. M. Cini, A. Balzarotti, Il Nuovo Cimento D 18, 89 (1996).
20. M. Cini, A. Balzarotti, Phys. Rev. B 56, 14711 (1997).
21. M. Cini, G. Stefanucci, A. Balzarotti, Solid State Commun. 109, 229 (1999); Eur. Phys. J. B 10, 293 (1999).
22. M. Cini, G. Stefanucci, A. Balzarotti, Solid State Commun. 109, 229 (1999); Eur. Phys. J. B 10, 293 (1999).
23. D. Zanchi, H.J. Schultz, cond-mat/9812303.
24. This does not imply that we are switching to a new representation with the vacuum at half filling; nor does it imply that the hole concentration or other parameters are necessarily the same as in hole or electron superconductors. The conventional nature of these statement is clear from the fact that when holes are paired, so are the electrons.
25. E. Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).
26. J.E. Hirsh, S. Tang, E. Loh Jr, D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1668 (1988).
27. C.A. Balseiro, A.G. Rojo, E.R. Gagliano, A. Alascio, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9315 (1988).
28. S. Mazumdar, F. Guo, D. Guo, K.C. Ung, J.T. Gammel, Proceedings of the Discussion Meeting on Strongly Correlated Electron Systems in Chemistry, Bangalore, India, (Springer Verlag, 1996).
29. 4, just two W = 0 configurations contribute significantly at weak coupling, and thus effective interaction and binding energy are the same.
30. G.S. Canright, S.M. Girvin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1943 (1989); see also N. Byers, C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 46 (1961).
31. G.S. Canright, S.M. Girvin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1943 (1989); see also N. Byers, C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 46 (1961).
32. J.R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, Frontiers in Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983).
33. C. Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solids (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963), Ch. 8.