The Effects of Organizational Practices on Sexual Harassment and Individual Outcomes in the Military

Military Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 303-328

  Williams, Jill Hunter ^a   Fitzgerald, Louise F ^a   Drasgow, Fritz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000946997     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1103_6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arnold v. City of Seminole, 614 F. Supp. 853, 40 FEP Cases at 1553 (ED. Okla. 1985).
2. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
3. Barret v. Omaha National Bank, 726 F.2d 424, 35 FEP Cases 593 (8th Cir. 1984).
4. Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
5. Bennett v. Corroon & Black Corp., 845 F.2d 104, 105-6 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1020 (1989).
6. Biaggio, M. K., Watts, D., & Brownell, A. (1990). Addressing sexual harassment: Strategies for prevention and change. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
7. Broderick v. Ruder, 46 EPD & 38, 042 (D.D.C. 1988).
8. Culbertson, A. L., & Rodgers, P. (1997). Improving managerial effectiveness in the workplace: The case of sexual harassment of Navy women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1953-1971.
9. Culbertson, A. L., & Rosenfeld, P. (1993). Understanding sexual harassment through organizational surveys. In P. Rosenfeld, J. E. Edwards, & M. D. Thomas (Eds.), Improving organizational surveys: New directions, methods, and applications (pp. 164-187). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Culbertson, A. L., & Rosenfeld, P. (1994). Assessment of sexual harassment in the active-duty Navy. Military Psychology, 6, 69-93.
11. Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 152-174). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Fain, T. C., & Anderton, D. L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles, 5, 291-311.
13. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1996). Institutional policies and procedures. In B. Lott & M. E. Reilly (Eds.), Combating sexual harassment in higher education (pp. 129-140). Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library Publications.
14. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
15. Fitzgerald, L. F., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: An integrated model. In G. Keita & J. Hurrell, Jr. (Eds.), Job stress in a changing workforce: Investigating gender, diversity, and family issues (pp. 55-73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of the antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 71, 309-328.
17. Grundmann, E. O., O'Donohue, W., & Peterson, S. H. (1997). The prevention of sexual harassment. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 175-184). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Gutek, B. A. (1997). Sexual harassment policy initiatives. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 185-198). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Hay, M. S., & Elig, T. W. (1999/this issue). The 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233-242.
20. Hesson-McInnis, M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 877-901.
21. Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In M. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace (Vol. 5, pp. 127-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. LaFontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. (1986). The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles, 15, 433-442.
23. Lindemann, B., & Kadue, D. D. (1992). Sexual harassment in employment law (pp. 415-424). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
24. Livingston, J. A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational and individual actions. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5-22.
25. Magley, V. J., Zickar, M. J., Salisbury, J., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997, April). Evaluating the effectiveness of sexual harassment training. In L. F. Fitzgerald (Chair), Innovations in sexual harassment theory and methods: Old questions, new answers. Symposium conducted at the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
26. Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
27. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 40 FEP Cases 1822 (1986).
28. Munson, L. J., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (1998). Sexual harassment and temporal dynamics: The effects of sexual harassment over time. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29. Popovich, P. M. (1988). Sexual harassment in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 273-282.
30. Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17, 269-290.
31. Pryor, J. B., Geidd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69-84.
32. Pryor, J. B., LaVite, C., & Stoller, L. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 68-83.
33. Pryor, J. B., & Stoller, L. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163-169.
34. Pryor, J. B., & Whalen, N. J. (1997). A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 129-151). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Robertson, C., Dyer, C. C., & Campbell, D. A. (1988). Campus harassment: Sexual harassment policies and procedures at institutions of higher learning. Signs, 13, 792-812.
36. Schneider, K. T. (1996, August). Bystander stress: The effect of organizational tolerance of sexual harassment on victims coworkers. Paper presented to the convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
37. Shrout v. Black Clawson Co., 689 F. Supp. 774, 46 FEP Cases 1339 (S.D. Ohio, 1988).
38. Shupe, E., Cortina, L. M., Ramos, A., Buchanan, N. T., Trujillo, O., & Antonatos, A. (1996, March). The outcomes of sexual harassment of Hispanic women. In L. F. Fitzgerald (Chair), Expanding the scope of sexual harassment with diverse populations. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Association of Women in Psychology, Portland, OR.
39. Sorenson, R. C., Luzio, R. C., & Mangione-Lambie, M. G. (1994, July). Perceived seriousness, recommended and expected organizational response, and effects of bystander and direct sexual harassment. Paper presented at the Third International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.
40. U.S. Department of Defense. (1995). Status of the Armed Forces Survey: 1995 Form B-Gender Issues (Survey No. 95-001b). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
41. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43. Valentine-French, S., & Radtke, H. L. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 545-555.
44. Yates v. Avco Corporation, 819 F.2d 630, 43 FEP Cases 1595 (6th Cir. 1987).
45. Zickar, M. J., Munson, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1997). Organizational antecedents of sexual harassment. Manuscript submitted for publication.