Segregation Distortion in Unstructured and Structured Populations: Competition Between ‘Sterile’ t Haplotypes

Netherlands Journal of Zoology

Volumn 46, Issue 3-4, 1995, Pages 216-226

  Van Boven, Michiel ^a   Weissing, Franz J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

coexistence; mathematical model; meiotic drive; metapopulation; polymorphism; rareness advantage; segregation distortion

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000946310     PISSN: 00282960     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156854295X00177     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bennett, D., A. K. Alton & K. Artzt, 1983. Genetic analysis of transmission ratio distortion by t-haplotypes in the mouse. Gen. Res. 41: 29-45.
2. Gummere, G. R., P. J. Mccormick & D. Bennett, 1986. The influence of genetic background and the homologous chromosome 17 on t-haplotype transmission ratio distortion in mice. Genetics 114: 235-245.
3. Johnson, L. R., S. H. Pilder & P. Olds-Clarke, 1996. The cellular basis for interaction of sterility factors in the mouse t haplotype. Gen. Res., Cambridge 66: 189-193.
4. Klein, J., P. Sipos & F. Figueroa, 1984. Polymorphism of t complex genes in European wild mice. Gen. Res. 44: 39-46.
5. Lenington, S. & I. L. Heisler, 1991. Behavioral reduction in the transmission of deleterious t haplotypes by wild house mice. Am. Nat. 137: 366-378.
6. Levin, B. R., M. L. Petras & D. I. Rasmussen, 1969. The effect of migration on the maintenance of a lethal polymorphism in the house mouse Am. Nat. 103: 647-661.
7. Lewontin, R. C., 1962. Interdeme selection controlling a polymorphism in the house mouse. Am. Nat. 96: 65-78.
8. Lewontin, R. & L. C. Dunn, 1960. The evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphism in the house mouse. Genetics 45: 705-722.
9. Lidicker, W. Z. & J. L. Patton, 1987. Patterns of dispersal and genetic structure in populations of small rodents. In: B. D. Chepka-Sade & Z. T. Talpin (Eds.): Mammalian Dispersal Patterns: 144-161. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Lyon, M. F., 1991. The genetic basis of transmission-ratio distortion and male sterility due to the t-complex. Am. Nat. 137: 349-358.
11. Lyon, M. F. & J. Zenthon, 1987. Differences in or near the responder region of complete and partial mouse t-haplotypes. Gen. Res., Cambridge 50: 29-34.
12. Nunney, L. & A. E. M. Baker, 1993. The role of deme size, reproductive patterns, and dispersal in the dynamics of t-lethal haplotypes. Evolution 47(5): 1342-1359.
13. Petras, M. L., 1967. Studies of natural populations of Mus. II. Polymorphism at the T-locus. Evolution 21: 466-478.
14. Petras, M. L. & J. C. Topping, 1983. The maintenance of polymorphisms at two loci in house mouse (Mus musculus) populations. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 25: 190-201.
15. Silver, L. M., 1993. The peculiar journey of a selfish chromosome: mouse t haplotypes and meiotic drive. Trends in Genetics 9(7): 250-254.
16. van Boven, R. M., F. J. Weissing, D. Heg & J. Huisman, 1996. Competition between segregation distorters: Coexistence of ‘superior’ and ‘inferior’ haplotypes at the t-complex. Evolution (in press).
17. van Boven, R. M., F. J. Weissing, 1996. Segregation distortion in a deme-structured population: Opposing demands of gene, individual, and group selection (submitted).
18. Weissing, F. J. & R. M. van Boven, 1996. Competition between segregation distorters in monoecious and dioecious populations (submitted).