The diamond 13C/12C isotope Raman pressure sensor system for high-temperature/pressure diamond-anvil cells with reactive samples

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 3256-3265

  Schiferl, David ^a   Nicol, Malcolm ^a,d   Zaug, Joseph M ^a   Sharma, S K ^b   Cooney, T F ^b   Wang, S Y ^b   Anthony, Thomas R ^c   Fleischer, James F ^c  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c GE GLOBAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000928601     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.366268     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. A. S. Zinn, D. Schiferl, and M. F. Nicol, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 1267 (1987).
2. D. Schiferl, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 1316 (1987).
3. D. Schiferl, J. N. Fritz, A. I. Katz, M. Schaefer, E. F. Skelton, S. B. Qadri, L. C. Ming, and M. H. Manghnani, in High-Pressure Research in Mineral Physics, edited by M. H. Manghnani and Y. Syono (Terra Scientific, Tokyo, 1987), pp. 75-83.
4. W. A. Bassett, A. H. Shen, M. Bucknum, and I-M. Chou, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 2340 (1993).
5. R. M. Hazen and L. W. Finger, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 75 (1981).
6. C.-M. Sung, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47, 1343 (1976).
7. H. K. Mao, R. J. Hemley, Y. Fei, J. F. Shu, L. C. Chen, A. P. Jephcoat, Y. Wu, and W. A. Bassett, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 8069 (1991).
8. J. A. Schouten, N. J. Trappeniers, and L. C. van den Bergh, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 1209 (1983).
9. F. C. J. van Anrooij, W. L. Vos, T. Jongenelen, W. J. Schuijlenburg, and J. A. Schouten, in High Pressure Science and Technology, edited by W. B. Holzapfel and P. G. Johannsen (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1990); High Press. Res. 4, 613 (1990).
10. F. C. J. van Anrooij, W. L. Vos, T. Jongenelen, W. J. Schuijlenburg, and J. A. Schouten, in High Pressure Science and Technology, edited by W. B. Holzapfel and P. G. Johannsen (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1990); High Press. Res. 4, 613 (1990).
11. D. L. Decker, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 3239 (1971).
12. J. C. Jamieson, J. N. Fritz, and M. H. Manghnani, in High Pressure Research in Geophysics, edited by S. Akimoto and M. H. Manghnani (Center for Academic Publishing, Tokyo, 1982), p. 27.
13. L. C. Ming, M. H. Manghnani, J. Balogh, S. B. Qadri, E. F. Skelton, and J. C. Jamieson, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4390 (1983).
14. D. L. Heinz and R. Jeanloz, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 885 (1984).
15. O. L. Anderson, D. G. Isaak, and S. Yamamoto, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1534 (1989).
16. R. M. Hazen and L. W. Finger, J. Appl. Cryst. 14, 234 (1981).
17. R. A. Forman, G. J. Piermarini, J. D. Barnett, and S. Block, Science 176, 284 (1972).
18. J. D. Barnett, S. Block, and G. J. Piermarini, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 44, 1 (1974).
19. G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, J. D. Barnett, and R. A. Forman, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2774 (1975).
20. D. M. Adams, R. Appleby, and S. K. Sharma, J. Phys. E 9, 1140 (1976).
21. H. K. Mao, P. M. Bell, J. W. Shaner, and D. J. Steinberg, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3276 (1978).
22. P. M. Bell, J. Xu, and H. K. Mao, in Shock Waves in Condensed Matter, edited by Y. M. Gupta (Plenum, New York, 1985), p. 125.
23. H. K. Mao, J. Xu, and P. M. Bell, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4673 (1986).
24. Y. M. Gupta and X. A. Shen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 583 (1991).
25. S. M. Sharma and Y. M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. B 43, 879 (1991).
26. D. D. Ragan, R. Gustavsen, and D. Schiferl, J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5539 (1992).
27. N. J. Hess and G. J. Exarhos, High Press. Res. 2, 57 (1989).
28. N. J. Hess and D. Schiferl, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 1953 (1990).
29. Q. Bi, J. M. Brown, and Y. Sato-Sorensen, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5357 (1990).
30. N. J. Hess and D. Schiferl, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 2082 (1992).
31. J. Liu and Y. K. Vohra, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3386 (1994).
32. S. C. Schmidt, D. Schiferl, A. S. Zinn, D. D. Ragan, and D. S. Moore, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2793 (1991).
33. J. E. Field, Properties of Diamond (Academic, London, 1979).
34. M. H. Grimsditch, E. Anastassakis, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 18, 901 (1978).
35. J. M. Boteler and Y. M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3497 (1993).
36. S. K. Sharma and J. P. Urmos, in Microbeam Analysis - 1987, edited by H. Geiss (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1987), p. 133.
37. W. F. Sherman, J. Phys. C 15, 9 (1982).
38. W. F. Sherman, J. Phys. C 18, L973 (1985).
39. M. Hanfland, K. Syassen, S. Fahy, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6896 (1985).
40. H. Boppart, J. van Straaten, and I. F. Silvera, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1423 (1985).
41. I. V. Aleksandrov, A. F. Goncharov, A. N. Zisman, and S. M. Stishov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 93, 680 (1987) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 66, 384 (1987)].
42. I. V. Aleksandrov, A. F. Goncharov, A. N. Zisman, and S. M. Stishov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 93, 680 (1987) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 66, 384 (1987)].
43. A. Tardieu, F. Cansell, and J. P. Petitet, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3243 (1990).
44. M. Hanfland and K. Syassen, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 2752 (1985).
45. S. K. Sharma, H. K. Mao, P. M. Bell, and J. Xu, J. Raman Spectrosc. 16, 350 (1985).
46. D. Schiferl (unpublished).
47. T. P. Mernagh and L. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 52, 507 (1991).
48. A. F. Goncharov, I. N. Makarenko, and S. M. Stishov, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 41, 150 (1985) [Soviet Phys. JETP Lett. 41, 184 (1985)].
49. A. F. Goncharov, I. N. Makarenko, and S. M. Stishov, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 41, 150 (1985) [Soviet Phys. JETP Lett. 41, 184 (1985)].
50. 13ν," and numbers should be "1.039," etc.).
51. R. S. Krishnan, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 24, 45 (1946).
52. W. J. Borer, S. S. Mitra, and K. V. Namjoshi, Solid State Commun. 9, 1377 (1971).
53. E. Anastassakis, H. C. Hwang, and C. H. Perry, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2493 (1971).
54. E. S. Zouboulis and M. Grimsditch, Phys. Rev. B 43, 12 490 (1991).
55. H. Herchen and M. A. Cappelli, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11 740 (1991).
56. E. Mroz (private communication).
57. T. R. Anthony and J. F. Fleischer, US Patent No. 5,110,579 (5 May, 1992).
58. J. Völkl and G. Alefeld, in Diffusion in Solids, edited by A. S. Nowick and J. J. Burton (Academic, New York, 1975), p 232.
59. R. Beckman, W. Kulisch, H. J. Frenck, and R. Kassing, Diam. Relat. Mater. 1, 164 (1992).
60. T. Kawato and K. Kondo, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 26, 1429 (1987).
61. J. A. Mucha, D. L. Flamm, and D. E. Ibbotson, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3448 (1989).
62. A. Inspektor, Y. Liou, T. McKenna, and R. Messier, Surf. Coat. Technol. 39/40, 211 (1989).
63. The process does not convert over 100% of the methane to diamond, of course. The average methane molecule collides 2.2 times (220%) with the hot filament on its way through the reactor. If only this collision was required to make diamond, the conversion efficiency would be 100%. While the processes involved are not completely understood, it is clear that some other things must take place. For example, atomic hydrogen must be produced at the hot filament and diffuse to the substrate to etch away any carbonaceous deposits that are not diamond. A considerable amount of such nondiamond carbon would be required to reduce the efficiency to only 4%.
64. R. M. Chrenko, J. Appl. Phys. 63, 5873 (1988).
65. 13C in a diamond.
66. W. F. Banholzer and T. R. Anthony, Diam. Relat. Mater. 1, 1157 (1992).
67. 12C diamond flakes from a broken diamond anvil are also easy to cut in the same way.) Particularly convenient is the fact that the pieces merely separate instead of springing across the room as most materials would. The high bulk modulus of diamond assures that there is no elastic energy stored during the cutting process. It is also very easy to pick up the shards by touching them with the tip of a small (50 μm diam) pivot drill to transfer them to the DAC. They are also released easily into the gasket hole.
68. S. A. Solin and A. K. Ramdas, Phys. Rev. B 1, 1687 (1970).
69. A. K. Ramdas, R. Vogelgesang, S. Rodriguez, M. Grimsditch, and T. R. Anthony, in Proceedings of the XVth International Conference on Raman Spectroscopy, edited by S. A. Asher and T. B. Stein (Wiley, New York, 1996), p. 21.
70. J. Wagner, C. Wild, W. Müller-Sebert, and P. Koidl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1284 (1992).
71. M. Mitsuhashi, S. Karasawa, S. Ohya, and F. Togashi, Appl. Surf. Sci. 60/61, 565 (1992).
72. 13C diamond Raman signal is lost, but the best crystallographic orientation of the diamond anvils is also the most common and the easiest to polish, while worst orientation is the most difficult to prepare.
73. J. G. Grasselli and W. M. Ritchey, Atlas of Spectral Data and Physical Constants of Organic Compounds, 2nd ed. (Chemical Rubber, Cleveland, 1975), Vol. 1, pp. 377-379.
74. D. Schiferl, S. K. Sharma, T. F. Cooney, S. Y. Wang, and K. Mohanan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 2821 (1993).