Computer software for risk assessment

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 148-150

  Greene, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000903415     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci960095h     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Richard, A. M. Application of SAR methods to non-congeneric databases associated with carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: issues and approaches. Mutation Res. 1994, 305, 73-97.
2. Sanderson, D. M.; Earnshaw, C. G.; Judson, P. N. Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system. Human Experimental Toxicology 1991, 10, 261-273.
3. Ridings, J. E.; Barratt, M. D.; Cary, R.; Earnshaw, C. G.; Eggington, C. E.; Ellis, M. K.; Judson. P. N.; Langowski, J. J.; Marchant, C. A.; Payne, M. P.; Watson, W. P.; Yin, T. D. Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure: an update on the DEREK system. Toxicology 1996, 106, 267-279.
4. Adams, J. Risk; UCL Press: London, 1995.
5. Krause, P. J.; Fox, J.; Judson, P. N. Is there a role for qualitative risk assessment? Presented at the Eleventh Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: UAI-95; August 18-20, Montreal, Quebec, 1995.
6. Fox, J.; Krause, P. J.; Ambler, S. J. Arguments, contradictions and practical reasoning. Proceedings of ECAI '92; John Wiley and Sons: 1992; pp 623-627.
7. Krause, P. J.; Fox, J.; Judson, P. N. An argumentation based approach to risk assessment. IMA J. Mathematics Applied Business Industry 1993/4, 5, 249-263.