Wilson effective Kähler potential for supersymmetric nonlinear [Formula presented] models

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 2461-2463

  Clark, T E ^a   Love, S T ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000897822     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2461     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 87B, 203 (1979).
2. W. Buchmüller, S. T. Love, R. D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. 115B, 77 (1982);
3. W. Buchmüller, R. D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B227, 503 (1983).
4. J. Bagger and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 118B, 103 (1982).
5. B. Ovrut and J. Wess, Phys. Rev. D 25, 409 (1982).
6. T. E. Clark and S. T. Love, Nucl. Phys. B232, 306 (1984);
7. B254, 569 (1985).
8. W. Lerche, Nucl. Phys. B238, 582 (1984).
9. T. Kugo, I. Ojima, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. 135B, 402 (1984).
10. M. Bando, T. Kuramoto, T. Maskawa, and S. Uehara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72, 313 (1984);
11. 72, 1207 (1984);
12. K. Itoh, T. Kugo, and H. Kunitomo, Nucl. Phys. B263, 295 (1986).
13. For a review of supersymmetric nonlinear (Formula presented) models see W. Buchmüller and W. Lerche, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 175, 159 (1987).APNYA6
14. K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1974);
15. K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12, 75 (1975).
16. F. J. Wegner and A. Houghton, Phys. Rev. A 8, 401 (1973);
17. F. J. Wegner, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1976), Vol. 6, p. 8;Trends in Elementary Particle Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1975), Vol. 37, p. 171.
18. K. Fujikawa and W. Lang, Nucl. Phys. B88, 61 (1975).
19. M. T. Grisaru, M. Roček, and W. Siegel, Nucl. Phys. B159, 429 (1979).
20. A. Hasenfratz and P. Hasenfratz, Nucl. Phys. B270, 685 (1986).
21. T. E. Clark, B. Haeri, and S. T. Love, Nucl. Phys. B402, 628 (1993). Note that the sign convention for the field anomalous dimension in this paper is opposite from that currently employed.
22. T. E. Clark and S. T. Love, Phys. Lett. B 388, 577 (1996). Note that the sign of the various coefficients of (Formula presented) in Eqs. (5), (7), and (8) should be reversed. The conclusions of the paper remain unchanged.
23. S. Yu. Khlebnikov, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5613 (1994).
24. A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. 59B, 79 (1975).
25. E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. B 14, 3110 (1976).
26. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and D. Z. Freedman, Phys. Rev. D 22, 846 (1980);
27. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and P. Ginsparg, Commun. Math. Phys. 102, 311 (1985).
28. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainstein, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. 139B, 389 (1984);
29. A. Y. Morozov, A. M. Perelomov, and M. A. Shifman, Nucl. Phys. B248, 279 (1984).
30. M. T. Grisaru, A. E. M. van de Ven, and D. Zanon, Nucl. Phys. B277, 388 (1986);
31. B277, 409 (1986).
32. F. J. Wegner, Z. Phys. B 78, 33 (1990).
33. G. E. Castilla and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 384 (1993);
34. Nucl. Phys. B485, 613 (1997).
35. J. L. Cardy and H. W. Hamber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 499 (1980).