Extension of Finite Volume Compressible Flow Solvers to Multi-dimensional, Variable Density Zero Mach Number Flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 248-286

  Schneider, T ^a,b   Botta, N ^a,b   Geratz, K J ^c   Klein, R ^a,b,d  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b ZUSE INSTITUTE BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^d POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conservation laws; Incompressible variable density flows

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW SIMULATION; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NUMERICAL METHODS; POISSON EQUATION;

CONSERVATION LAW; DIVERGENCE CONSTRAINT; FINITE-VOLUME; FLOW SOLVER; INCOMPRESSIBLE VARIABLE DENSITY FLOW; LEADING ORDERS; MULTI DIMENSIONAL; VARIABLE DENSITY; VARIABLE-DENSITY FLOWS; VELOCITY FIELD;

MACH NUMBER;

EID: 0000880485     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6327     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pember R. B., Howell L. H., Bell J. B., Colella P., Crutchfield W. Y., Fiveland W. A., Jessee J. P. An Adaptive Projection Method for Unsteady, Low-Mach Number Combustion. 1998.
2. Bell J., Colella P., Glaz H. A Second-Order Projection Method for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations. 1988.
3. Bell J., Marcus D. A second-order projection method for variable-density flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101:1992;334.
4. Bruneau C. H., Jouron C. An efficient scheme for solving steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 89:1990;389.
5. Karki K. C., Patankar S. V. Pressure based calculation procedure for viscous flows at all speeds in arbitrary configurations. AIAA J. 27:1989;1167.
6. Viozat C. Implicit Upwind Schemes for Low Mach Number Compressible Flows. 1997.
7. Zienkiewicz O. C., Szmelter J., Peraire J. Compressible and incompressible flow: An algorithm for all seasons. J. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 78:1990;105.
8. C.-D. Munz, S. Roller, R. Klein, and, K. J. Geratz, The extension of incompressible flow solvers to the weakly compressible regime, submitted.
9. Chorin A. J. Numerical solution of incompressible flow problems. Stud. Numer. Anal. 2:1968;64.
10. Chorin A. J. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comp. 22:1968;745.
11. Turkel E. J. Comput. Phys. 72:1987;277.
12. Einfeldt B. Inst. f. Geometrie u. Praktische Mathematik. On Godunov Type Methods for Gas Dynamics. 1986.
13. Puckett E. G., Almgren A. S., Bell J. B., Marcus D. L., Rider W. J. A high-order projection method for tracking fluid interfaces in variable density incompressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 130:1997;269.
14. Bijl H., Wesseling P. A unified method for computing incompressible and compressible flows in boundary-fitted coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 141:1998;153.
15. Guillard H., Viozat C. On the Behavior of Upwind Schemes in the Low Mach Number Limit. 1997.
16. Harlow F. H., Welch J. E. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with a free surface. Phys. Fluids. 8:1965;2182.
17. Demirdzic I., Peric M. Finite volume method for prediction of fluid flow in arbitrarily shaped domains with moving boundaries. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 10:1990;771.
18. Geratz K. J. Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen. Erweiterung eines Godunov-Typ-Verfahrens für zwei-dimensionale kompressible Strömungen auf die Fälle kleiner und verschwindender Machzahl. 1997.
19. Klein R. Semi-implicit extension of a godunov-type scheme based on low mach number asymptotics. I. One-dimensional flow. J. Comput. Phys. 121:1995;213.
20. Sesterhenn J. L. Zur numerischen Berechnung kompressibler Strömungen bei kleinen Mach-Zahlen. 1995.
21. Sesterhenn J. L., Müller B., Thomann H. Flux-vector splitting for compressible low mach number flow. J. Comput. Fluids. 22:1993;441.
22. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. I. The quest of monotonicity. Lecture Notes in Phys. 18:1973;163.
23. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 14:1974;361.
24. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 23:1977;263.
25. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection. J. Comput. Phys. 23:1977;276.
26. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32:1979;101.
27. Gresho P. M., Chan S. T. On the theory of semi-implicit projection methods for viscous incompressible flow and its implementation via a finite element method that also introduces a nearly consistent mass matrix. Part 2. Implementation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 11:1990;621.
28. Ghia K. N., Ghia U., Shin C. T. High-re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J. Comput. Phys. 48:1982;387.
29. Terhoeven P. Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen. Ein numerisches Verfahren zur Berechnung von Flammenfronten bei kleiner Machzahl. May 22, 1998.
30. Wesseling P. An Introduction to Multigrid Methods. 1991.
31. Courant R., Friedrichs K. O., Lewy H. Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der Physik. Math. Ann. 100:1928;32.
32. Sauer R. Theoretische Einfuehrung in die Gasdynamik. 1943.
33. Almgren A. S., Bell J. B., Colella P., Howell L. H., Welcome M. L. A Conservative Adaptive Projection Method for the Variable Density Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations. 1996.
34. Klainerman S., Majda A. J. Compressible and incompressible fluids. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35:1982;629.
35. Schochet S. Asymptotics for symmetric hyperbolic systems with a large parameter. J. Differential Equations. 75:1988;1.
36. Schulz-Rinne C. W. The Riemann Problem for Two-Dimensional Gas Dynamics and New Limiters for High-Order Schemes. 1993.
37. Soh W. Y., Goodrich J. W. Unsteady solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 79:1988;113.
38. Strang G. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5:1968;506.
39. Patankar S. V., Spalding D. B. A calculation procedure for heat, mass, and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 15:1972;1787.
40. Smiljanovski V., Moser V., Klein R. A capturing-tracking hybrid scheme for deflagration discontinuities. J. Combust. Theory Modeling. 1:1997;183.