Physician assessment pilot study for the royal australasian college of physicians

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 103-111

  Paget, Neil S ^a   Saunders, Nicholas A ^c   Newble, David I ^b   Du, Jenny ^a  

^a ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Continuing medical education; Maintenance of competence; Peer review; Recertification

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000870095     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.4750160206     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gabb RG. Recertification: an Australasian perspective. In: Newble DI, Jolly B, Wakeford R, eds. The certification and recertification of doctors: issues in the assessment of clinical competence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 47–66
2. Saunders NA, Paget NS. Maintenance of professional standards and the recertification of physicians. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 363–365.
3. Ramsey PG, Marjorie D, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993; 269: 1655–1660.
4. Carline JD, Wenrich M, Ramsey PG. Characteristics of ratings of physician competence by professional associates. Evaluation Health Prof 1989; 12: 409–423.
5. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP, Wenrich MD. Predictive validity of certification by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 719–726.
6. Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Cites LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med 1993; 68: 680–687.
7. Newble DI, Paget NS, Steen DM, Johnston PR. The acceptability and feasibility of the Physician Assessment component of the Maintenance of Professional Standards program of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. In: Rothman AI, Cohen R, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Ottawa Conference on Medical Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Bookstore Custom Publishing, 1994: 444–446.
8. McAuley RG, Paul WM, Morrison GH, Beckett RF, Goldsmith CH. Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Can MedAssoc J 1990; 143: 1193–1199.
9. Hoftvedt BO, Mjell J. Referrals: peer review as continuing medical education. Teach Learn Med 1993; 5: 234–237.
10. Gellhorn A. Periodic physician recredentialing. JAMA 1991; 265: 752–755.
11. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: a review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992; 268: 1111–1117.
12. Tracey JM. Peer review. Part 2: the influence of internal and external standards on outcome. N Z Med J 1991; 104: 66–67.
13. Lawrence SL, Oye RK, Cope DW, DiMatteo MR. Use of nonphysician staff to evaluate humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents and faculty members. J Med Educ 1986; 61: 918–920.
14. Shavelson RJ, Webb NM. Generalizability theory: a primer. Chapter 8: generalizability and decision studies with different designs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991: 115–126.