Ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy with a micromechanical calorimeter sensor

Review of Scientific Instruments

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 3099-3103

  Moreland, John ^a   Löhndorf, Markus ^a   Kabos, Pavel ^a   McMichael, R D ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000865925     PISSN: 00346748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1305508     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. J. Schmidt and I. Solomon, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 3719 (1966).
2. W. S. Moore and T. M. Al-Sharbati, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 6, 367 (1973).
3. J. R. Barnes, R. J. Stephenson, C. N. Woodburn, S. J. O'Shea, M. E. Weiland, T. Rayment, J. K. Gimzewski, and Ch. Gerber, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 3793 (1994).
4. S. Chikazumi, Physics of Magnetism (Kreiger, Malabar, FL, 1964), pp. 333-348.
5. P. Kabos, C. E. Patton, M. O. Dima, D. B. Church, R. L. Stamps, and R. E. Camely, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3553 (1994).
6. J. Booth, National Institute of Standards and Technology (private communication). The surface resistance of a metallic film assuming that losses are dominated by eddy current heating is Z≈p/t given t≪δ. We have verified this result based on first principles and note that one must further require that the reflectivity of the film be close to unity. As the film thickness is decreased and its reflectivity drops well below unity the relation Z≈p/t is no longer valid.
7. S. Zhang, J. B. Sokoloff, and C. Vittoria, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5076 (1997).
8. R. H. Koch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4512 (1998).
9. S. E. Russek, J. O. Oti, S. Kaka, and E. Y. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4773 (1999).
10. D. Sarid, Scanning Force Microscopy with Applications to Electric, Magnetic, and Atomic Forces (Oxford, New York, 1991), pp. 39-53.
11. D. Sarid, Scanning Force Microscopy with Applications to Electric, Magnetic, and Atomic Forces (Oxford, New York, 1991), pp. 1-17.