Ambulatory assessment of diurnal changes with a hand-held computer: Mood, attention and morningness-eveningness

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 641-656

  Fahrenberg, Jochen ^a   Brügner, Georg ^a   Foerster, Friedrich ^a   Käppier, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ambulatory assessment; Attention; Electronic diary; Morningness eveningness; Retrospection effect (recall error); Selfreport

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000852282     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00160-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baumann, U., Thiele, C., Laireiter, A. R., & Krebs, A. (1996). Computer-assisted interaction diary on social networks, social support and interpersonal stress. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 69-83). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
2. Brügner, G. (in press). Monitor: Ein flexibles Programm zur Datenerhebung mittels Pocket-PC. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie.
3. Buse, L., & Pawlik, K. (1996). Ambulatory behavioural assessment and in-field performance testing. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 29-50). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
4. DeLongis, A., Hemphill, K. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1992). A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In F. B. Bryant, J. Edwards, R. S. Tindale, E. J. Posavac, L. Heath, E. Henderson, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Methodological issues in applied social psychology. Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 2, pp. 83-109). New York: Plenum Press.
5. Fahrenberg, J. (1996a). Ambulatory Assessment: Issues and perspectives. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 3-20). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
6. Fahrenberg, J. (1996b). Concurrent assessment of blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity and emotional state in natural settings. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 165-187). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
7. Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., & Selg, H. (1994). Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI-R (6th ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
8. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (Eds.) (1996). Ambulatory Assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
9. Hedges, S. M., Jandorf, L., & Stone, A. A. (1985). Meaning of daily mood assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 428-434.
10. Heger, R. (1990). Psychophysiologisches 24-Stunden-Monitoring. Methodenentwicklung und erste Ergebnisse eines multimodalen Untersuchungsansatzes bei 62 normotonen und blutdrucklabilen Studenten. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Freiburg i. Br. Frankfurt, a. M.: Lang.
11. Horne, J. A., & Östberg, O. (1976). A selfassessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97-110.
12. Käppler, C. (1994). Psychophysiologische Bedingungsanalyse von Blutdruckveränderungen im alltäglichen Lebenskontext. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Freiburg i. Br. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
13. Käppler, C., Becker, H.-U., & Fahrenberg, J. (1993). Ambulantes 24-Stunden-Monitoring als psychophysiologische Assessmentstrategie: Reproduzierbarkeit, Reaktivität, Retrospektionseffekt und Bewegungskonfundierung. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 14, 235-251.
14. Käppler, C., Brügner, G., & Fahrenberg, J. (submitted). Computer-unterstütztes Assessment mit MONITOR: Befindlichkeit und Aufmerksamkeit im Alltag. Diagnostica.
15. Kerkhof, G. A. (1985). Interindividual differences in the human circadian system: A review. Biological Psychology, 20, 83-112.
16. Myrtek, M., Brügner, G., & Müller, W. (1996). Interactive monitoring and contingency analysis of emotionally induced ECG changes: Methodology and applications. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 115-127). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
17. Natale, V., & Cicogna, P. (1996). Circadian regulation of subjective alertness in morning and evening "types". Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 491-497.
18. Neubauer, A. C. (1992). Psychometric comparison of two circadian rhythm questionnaires and their relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 125-131.
19. Östberg, O. (1976). Zur Typologie der circadianen Phasenlage - Ansätze zu einer praktischen Chronohygiene. In G. Hildebrandt (Ed.), Biologische Rhythmen und Arbeit (pp. 117-137). Wien: Springer.
20. Perrez, M., & Reicherts, M. (1996). A computer-assisted selfmonitoring procedure for assessing stress-related behaviour under real life conditions. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 51-67). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
21. Schandry, R., & Leopold, Ch. (1996). Ambulatory assessment of selfmonitored subjective and objective symptoms of diabetic patients. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 393-402). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
22. Smith, W. B., & Safer, M. A. (1993). Effects of present pain level on recall of chronic pain and medication use. Pain, 55, 355-361.
23. Sorbi, M. J., Honkoop, P. C., & Godaert, G. L. R. (1996). A signal-contingent computer diary for the assessment of psychological precedents of the migraine attack. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 403-412). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber.
24. Tankova, I., Adan, A., & Buela-Casal, G. (1994). Circadian typology and individual differences: a review. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 671-684.
25. Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (1992/93). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung TAP. Psychologisches Institut der Universität. Freiburg: Psytest.