Proximity and threats in highland ponies

Social Networks

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 227-238

  Roberts Jr , John M ^a   Browning, Bridget A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000829681     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00002-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arnold G.W., Grassia A. Ethogram of agonistic behaviour for thoroughbred horses. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8:1982;5-25.
2. Becker M.P. Maximum likelihood estimation of the RC(M) association model. Appl. Stat. 39:1990;152-167.
3. Clogg, C.C., Shihadeh, E.S., 1994. Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Clutton-Brock T.H., Greenwood P.J., Powell R.P. Ranks and relationships in highland ponies and highland cows. Z. Tierpsychol. 41:1976;202-216.
5. de Leeuw J., van der Heijden P.G.M. Correspondence analysis of incomplete contingency tables. Psychometrika. 53:1988;223-233.
6. Ellard M.-E., Crowell-Davis S.L. Evaluating equine dominance in draft mares. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 24:1989;55-75.
7. Fournier F., Festa-Bianchet M. Social dominance in adult female mountain goats. Anim. Behav. 49:1995;1449-1459.
8. Goodman, L.A., 1984. The Analysis of Cross-classified Categorical Data Having Ordered Categories. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Goodman L.A. Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual log-linear model approach in the analysis of contingency tables. Int. Stat. Rev. 54:1986;243-309. (with discussion).
10. Goodman L.A. Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86:1991;1085-1138. (with discussion).
11. Greenberg-Cohen D., Alkon P.U., Yomtov Y. A linear dominance hierarchy in female Nubian ibex. Ethology. 98:1994;210-220.
12. Hall M.J. Social organization in an enclosed group of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Rhum: I. The dominance hierarchy of females and their offspring. Z. Tierpsychol. 61:1983;250-262.
13. Hall M.J. Social organization in an enclosed group of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Rhum: II. Social grooming, mounting behavior, spatial organisation and their relationships to dominance rank. Z. Tierpsychol. 61:1983;273-292.
14. Hass C.C. Social status in female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): expression, development, and reproductive correlates. J. Zool. London. 225:1991;509-523.
15. Jackson W.M. Can individual differences in history of dominance explain the development of linear dominance hierarchies? Ethology. 79:1988;71-77.
16. Locati M., Lovari S. Clues for dominance in female chamois: age, weight, or horn size. Aggressive Behav. 17:1991;11-15.
17. Manly, B.F.J., 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall, London.
18. Mooring M.S., Hart B.L. Effects of relatedness, dominance, age, and association on reciprocal allogrooming by captive impala. Ethology. 94:1993;207-220.
19. Raftery A.E. Choosing models for cross-classifications. Am. Soc. Rev. 51:1986;145-146.
20. Rutberg A.T. Factors influencing dominance status in American bison cows. Z. Tierpsychol. 63:1983;206-212.
21. Rutberg A.T., Greenberg S.A. Dominance, aggression frequencies, and modes of aggressive competition in feral pony mares. Anim. Behav. 40:1990;322-331.
22. Thouless C.R., Guinness F.E. Conflict between red deer hinds: the winner always wins. Anim. Behav. 34:1986;1166-1171.
23. van Dierendonck M.C., de Vries H., Schilder M.B.H. An analysis of dominance, its behavioural parameters, and possible determinants in a herd of Icelandic horses. Neth. J. Zool. 45:1995;362-385.
24. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
25. Wells S.M., von Goldschmidt-Rothschild B. Social behavior and relationships in a herd of Camargue horses. Z. Tierpsychol. 49:1979;363-380.