Evaluating artifact burial by eolian versus bioturbation processes, South Carolina Sandhills, USA

Geoarchaeology - An International Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 309-330

  Leigh, David S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTURBATION; CLAY SOIL; CRETACEOUS; CRYSTALLINE ROCK; LANDSCAPE; LOAMY SAND; PREHISTORIC; SEDIMENTATION; SUBSOIL;

CAROLINA; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY; ISRAELI COASTAL PLAIN; NEBRASKA; PUERTO RICO; SAND HILLS; SANDHILLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0000822906     PISSN: 08836353     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(199802)13:3<309::AID-GEA4>3.0.CO;2-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahlbrandt, T.S. (1979). Textural Parameters of Eolian Sands. In E.D. McKee, Ed., A Study of Global Sand Seas, Chapter B, pp 21-54. Professional Paper 1032. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.
2. Al-Sanabani, G.A. (1987). Investigation of Hydraulic Equivalence in Beach and Dune Sands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens (unpublished).
3. Daniels, R.B. (1969). Eolian Sands Associated with Coastal Plain River Valleys - Some Problems in Their Age and Source. Southeastern Geology 11, 97-110.
4. Daniels, R.B., and Hammer, R.D. (1992). Soil Geomorphology. New York: John Wiley.
5. Delcourt, H.R., and Delcourt, P.A. (1985). Quaternary Palynology and Vegetational History of the Southeastern United States. In V.M. Bryant, Jr., and R.G. Holloway, Eds., Pollen Records of Late-Quaternary North American Sediments, pp. 1-37. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Dallas, TX.
6. Foss, J.E., Lewis, R.J., and Stiles, C.J. (1993). Soil Characteristics of Archeological Sites Investigated in the Jefferson Bypass Project in South Carolina. In J.D. Gunn and K.J. Wilson, Eds., Archeological Data Recovery Investigations at Sites 38CT54 and 38CT58 along the S.C. 151 Jefferson Bypass, Chesterfield County, South Carolina, pp. 227-251. Project # 92-40-06905. Raleigh, North Carolina: Garrow and Associates.
7. Friedman, G.M. (1961). Distinction between Dune, Beach, and River Sands from Their Textural Characteristics. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 31, 514-529.
8. Friedman, G.M. (1979). Address of the Retiring President of the International Association of Sedimentologists: Differences in Size Distributions of Populations of Particles among Sands of Various Origins. Sedimentology 26, 3-32.
9. Gamble, E.E., Daniels, R.B., and McCracken, R.J. (1969). A2 Horizons of Coastal Plain Soils Pedogenic or Geologic Origin. Southeastern Geology 11, 137-152.
10. Gunn, J.D., and Foss, J.E. (1992). Copperhead Hollow (38CT58): Middle Holocene Upland Conditions on the Piedmont-Coastal Plain Margin. South Carolina Antiquities 24, 1-17.
11. Hand, B.M. (1967). Differentiation of Beach and Dune Sand Using Settling Velocities of Light and Heavy Minerals. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 37, 514-520.
12. Indurante, S.J., Follmer, L.R., Hammer, R.D., and Koenig, P.G. (1990). Particle Size Analysis by a Modified Pipette Procedure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54, 560-563.
13. Johnson, D.L. (1990). Biomantle Evolution and the Redistribution of Earth Materials and Artifacts. Soil Science 149, 84-102.
14. Johnson, D.L., and Watson-Stegner, D. (1990). The Soil-Evolution Model as a Framework for Evaluating Pedoturbation in Archeological Site Formation. In N.P. Lasca and J. Donahue, Eds., Archeological Geology of North America, Chap. 31, pp. 541-558. Centennial Special Volume 4. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.
15. Leigh, D.S., and Feeney, T.P. (1995). Paleochannels Indicating Wet Climate and Lack of Response to Lower Sea Level, Southeast Georgia, U.S.A. Geology 23, 687-690.
16. Lowright, R.H. (1973). Environmental Determination Using Hydraulic Equivalence Studies. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 43, 1143-1147.
17. Markewich, H.W., and Markewich, W. (1994). An Overview of Pleistocene and Holocene Inland Dunes in Georgia and the Carolinas - Morphology, Distribution, Age, and Paleoclimate. Bulletin 2069, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.
18. McMakin, T.A., Rust, T.R., and Poplin, E.C. (1997). Archeological Data Recovery in the South Carolina Highway 151 Widening Project, Chesterfield County, South Carolina Contract Report. Raleigh, North Carolina: Brockington and Associates. Submitted to the South Carolina Department of Transportation.
19. Michie, J. (1990). Bioturbation and Gravity as a Potential Site Formation Process: The Open Area Site, 38GE261, Georgetown County, South Carolina. South Carolina Antiquities 22, 27-46.
20. Morton, R.M. (1995). Soil Survey of Chesterfield County, South Carolina. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
21. Rubey, W.W. (1933). The Size Distribution of Heavy Minerals within a Waterlaid Sandstone. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 3, 3-29.
22. Soller, D.R., and Mills, H.H. (1991). Surficial Geology and Geomorphology. In J.W. Horton, Ed., The Geology of the Carolinas, Chap. 17, pp. 290-308. Carolina Geological Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
23. Steidtmann, J.R., and Haywood, H.C. (1982). Settling Velocities of Quartz and Tourmaline in Eolian Sandstone Strata. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 52, 395-399.
24. Thom, B.G. (1967). Coastal and Fluvial Landforms, Horry and Marion Counties, South Carolina. Coastal Studies Series 19. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
25. USDA Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil Survey Manual. Handbook 18. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
26. Von Englehardt, W. (1940). Die unterschiedung wasser-und wind-sortierter Sande auf Grund der Korngrossen-vertielung ihrer leichten und schweren Gemengteile. Chemie der Erde 12, 445-465.
27. Watson, R.L. (1969). Modified Rubey's Law Accurately Predicts Sediment Settling Velocities. Water Resources Research 5, 1147-1150.