Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 167-207

  Anderson, John R ^a   Corbett, Albert T ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a   Pelletier, Ray ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000796225     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: 15327809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
3. Anderson, J. R. (Ed.). (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Anderson, J. R., Bellezza, F. S., & Boyle, C. F. (1993). The geometry tutor and skill acquisition. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Rules of the mind (pp. 165–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A., & Lewis, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 7–49.
6. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Farrell, R., & Reiser, B. J. (1987). Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modeling cognition (pp. 93–134). New York: Wiley.
7. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Yost, G. (1986). The geometry tutor. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 5–19.
8. Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F. G., & Corbett, A. T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467–505.
9. Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F., Corbett, A. T., Fincham, J. M., Hoffman, D., & Wu, Q. (1993). Computer programming and transfer. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Rules of the mind (pp. 205–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Fincham, J. M., Hoffman, D., & Pelletier, R. (1992). General principles for an intelligent tutoring architecture. In J. W. Regian & V. J. Shute (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to automated instruction (pp. 81–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Anderson, J. R., Farrell, R., & Sauers, R. (1984). Learning to program in LISP. Cognitive Science, 8, 87–130.
12. Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Kline, P. J., & Neves, D. M. (1981). Acquisition of problem-solving skill. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 191–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Anderson, J. R., & Pelletier, R. (1991). A development system for model-tracing tutors. In L. Birnbaum (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1–8). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
14. Anderson, J. R., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). The LISP tutor. Byte, 10, 159–175.
15. Anderson, L. W., & Burns, R. B. (1987). Values, evidence, and mastery learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 215–223.
16. Block, J. H. (1971). Mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4–16.
18. Brown, J. S. (1985). Idea amplifiers: New kinds of electronic learning. Educational Horizons, 63, 108–112.
19. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.
20. Bunderson, C. V., & Faust, G. W. (1976). Programmed and computer-assisted instruction. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods: 75th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.
22. Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1987). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. M. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1991, April). Feedback control and learning to program with the CMU LISP tutor. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
25. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1992). Student modeling and mastery learning in a computer-based programming tutor. In C. Fiasson, G. Gauthier, & G. McGalla (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 413–420). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. Corbett, A. T., Anderson, J. R., & O'Brien, A. T. (1995). Student modeling in the ACT programming tutor. In P. Nichols, S. Chipman, & R. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 19–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Gagné, R., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28. Goldenson, D. R. (1989a). The impact of structure editing on introductory computer science education: The results so far. SIGCSE Bulletin, 21, 26–29.
29. Goldenson, D. R. (1989b). Teaching introductory programming methods using structure editing: Some empirical results. In W. C. Ryan (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Educational Computing Conference 1989 (pp. 194–203). Eugene: University of Oregon, International Council on Computers in Education.
30. Guskey, T. R. (1987). Rethinking mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 225–229.
31. Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leadership, 43, 73–80.
32. Key Curriculum Press. (1991). Geometer's sketchpad [Computer software], Berkeley, CA: Author.
33. Klahr, D., & Carver, S. M. (1988). Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning and transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 362–404.
34. Koedinger, K., & Anderson, J. R. (1993). Effective use of intelligent software in high school math classrooms. In Artificial intelligence in education: Proceedings of the World Conference on AI in Education (pp. 241–248). Charlottsville, VA: AACE.
35. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511–550.
36. Kulik, C., Kulik, J., & Bangert-Downs, R. (1986). Effects of testing for mastery on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
37. Laddaga, R., Levine, A., & Suppes, P. (1981). Studies of student preference for computer-assisted instruction with audio. In P. Suppes (Ed.), University-live computer-assisted instruction at Stanford: 1968–1980 (pp. 399–430). Stanford, CA: Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences.
38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Palo Alto, CA: Institution for Research in Learning.
39. Lewis, M. W. (1989). Developing and evaluating the CMU algebra tutor: Tension between theoretically driven and pragmatically driven design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
40. Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for high school algebra errors. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 25–50). New York: Academic.
41. McKendree, J. (1990). Effective feedback content for tutoring complex skills. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 381–413.
42. McKendree, J. E. (1986). Impact of feedback content during complex skill acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
43. Milson, R., Lewis, M. W., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). The teacher's apprentice project: Building an algebra tutor. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 53–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Commission on Standards for School Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
46. Poison, P., & Kieras, D. E. (1985). A quantitative model of learning and performance of text editing knowledge. In L. Bormann & B. Curtis (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI '85 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (pp. 207–212). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
47. Porter, D. (1961). An application of reinforcement principles to classroom teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Education, Laboratory for Research in Instruction.
48. Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1980). A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 198, 121–134.
49. Reder, L. M., Charney, D. H., & Morgan, K. I. (1986). The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text. Memory and Cognition, 14, 64–78.
50. Scheines, R., & Sieg, W. (1993). An experimental comparison of alternative proof construction environments (Tech. Rep. No. CMU-PHIL-40). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Philosophy.
51. Schofield, J. W., & Evan-Rhodes, D. (1989). Artificial intelligence in the classroom: The impact of a computer-based tutor in teachers and students. In D. Bierman, J. Breuker, & J. Sandberg (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and education (pp. 238–243). Amsterdam: IOS.
52. Shephard, L. A. (1992). Psychometricians' beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, 21, 2–16.
53. Shute, V. J., Woltz, D. J., & Regian, J. W. (1989). An investigation of learner differences in an ITS environment: There is no such theory as a free lunch. In D. Bierman, J. Breuker, & J. Sandberg (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and education (pp. 260–266) Amsterdam IOS.
54. Singley, M. K. (1986). Developing models of skill acquisition in the context of intelligent tutoring systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
55. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Singley, M. K., Anderson, J. R., Gevins, J. S., & Hoffman, D. (1989). The algebra word problem tutor. In D. Bierman, J. Breuker, & J. Sandberg (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and education (pp. 267–275). Amsterdam: IOS.
57. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Taking the mystery out of mastery: A response to Guskey, Anderson, and Burns. Review of Educational Research, 57, 231–235.
58. Sleeman, D. H., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems. London: Academic.
59. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–286.
60. Wertheimer, R. (1990). The Geometry Proof tutor: An “intelligent” computer-based tutor in the classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 308–313.
61. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York: Macmillan.