Universality classes of driven lattice gases

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages

  Garrido, Pedro L ^a   Muñoz, Miguel A ^a   de los Santos, F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

CRITICAL BEHAVIOR; DRIVEN DIFFUSIVE SYSTEMS; DRIVING FIELD; DRIVING LIMIT; ENTROPIC CONTRIBUTIONS; LANGEVIN EQUATION; LATTICE GAS; UNIVERSALITY CLASS;

CRYSTAL LATTICES;

EID: 0000765564     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R4683     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S. Katz, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1655 (1983)
2. S. KatzJ. L. LebowitzH. SpohnJ. Stat. Phys. 34, 497 (1984).
3. B. Schmittmann and R. K. P. Zia, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1995).
4. J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
5. H. K. Janssen and B. Schmittmann, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 64, 503 (1986).
6. See also K.-t. Leung and J. L. Cardy, J. Stat. Phys. 44, 567 (1986)
7. J. Stat. Phys.K.-t. LeungJ. L. Cardy45, 1087 (1986).
8. K.-t. Leung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 453 (1991)
9. J. S. Wang, J. Stat. Phys. 82, 1409 (1996).
10. K.-t. Leung and J. S. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 10, 853 (1999).
11. Let us stress that other predictions of the standard field theory seem to be varified by performing a finite size scaling analysis (see 5 and 6), but a fully consistent scaling, including good data collapse for the order parameter, has never been observed. See the criticisms to 5 and 6 in 10.
12. E. Praestgaard, H. Larsen, and R. K. P. Zia, Europhys. Lett. 25, 447 (1994)
13. Europhys. Lett.Z. Cheng, P. L. Garrido, J. L. Lebowitz, and J. L. Vallés, 14, 507 (1991). Note that the two temperature model is equivalent to the random DLG at criticality.
14. J. Marro and A. Achahbar, J. Stat. Phys. 90, 817 (1998).
15. J. Marro, A. Achahbar, P. L. Garrido, and J. Marro, Phys. Rev. E 53, 6038 (1996).
16. P. L. Garrido, F. de los Santos, and M. A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. E 57, 752 (1998).
17. F. de los Santos and P. L. Garrido, J. Stat. Phys. 96, 303 (1999).
18. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977).
19. F. de los Santos and M. A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1161 (2000). A combinatorial error in the original calculation was corrected after a comment by S. Caracciolo (see also 16).
20. S. Caracciolo, A. Gambassi, M. Gubinelli, and A. Pelissetto (private communication).
21. B. Schmittmann, H. K. Janssen, U. C. Taeuber, R. K. P. Zia, K.-t. Leung, and J. L. Cardy, e-print cond-mat/9912286.
22. For a presentation of the entropic versus the energetic part of the Ginzburg-Landau theory, see G. Parisi, in Frontiers in Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1988).
23. The detailed calculation will be presented elsewhere.
24. Observe that in the absence of the new term isotropic naive scaling, (Formula presented) had to be assumed. In the present case, (Formula presented) is obtained by imposing the leading term in the parallel direction to be marginal at the critical dimension.
25. B. Schmittmann and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 357 (1991)
26. B. Schmittmann, Europhys. Lett. 24, 109 (1993). See also 2, Sec. 6.1.
27. Note that results up to first order in epsilon coincide with those obtained in our previous paper 14, but here (Formula presented)
28. See A. D. Rutenberg and C. Yeung, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2710 (1999), and references therein.
29. The prediction for the exponent ν up to two loops is (Formula presented) Monte Carlo simulations yield values around 0.7 for the DLG 3, and (Formula presented) for the random DLG 2.
30. S. Caracciolo, R. G. Edwards, S. G. Ferreira, A. Pelissetto, and A. D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2969 (1995).