Modelling of sound fields in enclosed spaces with absorbent room surfaces Part II. Absorptive panels

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 373-384

  Dance, S M ^a   Shield, B M ^a  

^a LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000737088     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-682X(00)00011-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Dance S, Shield B. Modelling of sound fields in enclosed spaces with absorbent room surfaces. Part I: Performance spaces. Applied Acoustics 1999;58(1):1-18.
2. Dance S, Roberts J, Shield B. Computer prediction of insertion loss due to a single barrier in a non-diffuse empty enclosed space. Journal of Building Acoustics 1994;1(2):125-36.
3. Farina A. RAMSETE - A new pyramid tracer for medium and large scale acoustic problems, Proc. Euronoise 1995;95:55-60.
4. Dance S, Shield B. The complete image-source method for the prediction of sound distribution in non-diffuse enclosed spaces. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997.
5. Mehta M, Mulholland K. Effect of non-uniform distribution of absorption on reverberation time. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1976;46:209.
6. Arau-Puchades H. An improved reverberation formula. Acustica 1988;65:163-80.
7. Eyring C. Reverberation time in 'dead' rooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1930;1:217-26.
8. Millington G. A modified formula for reverberation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1932;4:69-81.
9. Gomperts M. Do the classical reverberation formulae still have the right for existence? Acustica 1965;255:66.
10. Hodgson M. When is diffuse field theory applicable? Applied Acoustics 1996;49(3):197-207.
11. Dance S, Shield B. Modelling of sound fields in enclosed spaces with absorbent room surfaces. Part III: Barriers. Applied Acoustics 2000:61(4):385-97.