Diversity of Lepidoptera in Ohio forests at local and regional scales: How heterogeneous is the fauna?

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 583-591

  Summerville, Keith S ^a   Metzler, Eric H ^b   Crist, Thomas O ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Complementarity; Moth; Rarity; Scale dependence; Spatial extent; Species richness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000731602     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0583:DOLIOF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ackery, P. R., and R. I. Vane-Wright. 1984. Milkweed butterflies. British Museum of Natural History, London, UK.
2. Austin, G. T., N. M. Haddad, C. Mendez, T. D. Sisk, D. D. Murphy, A. E. Launer, and P. R. Ehrlich. 1996. Annotated checklist of the butterflies of the Tikal National Park area of Guatemala. Trop. Lepid. 7: 21-37.
3. Bailey, R. G. 1998. Ecoregions: the ecosystem geography of the oceans and continents. Springer, New York
4. Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
5. Butler, L., and J. Strazanae. 2000. Occurrence of Lepidoptera on selected host trees in two central Appalachian national forests. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 500-511.
6. Chao, A. 1987. Estimating population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43: 783-791.
7. Coddington, J. A., L. H. Young, and F. A. Coyle. 1996. Estimating spider species richness in a southern Appalachian cove hardwood forest. J. Arachnol. 24: 111-128.
8. Cody, M. L. 1975. Toward a theory of continental species diversities, pp. 214-257. In M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond [eds.], Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Colwell, R.K., and D.C. Lees. 2000. The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 70-76.
10. Colwell, R. K., and J. A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345: 101-118.
11. Chey, V. K., J. D. Holloway, and M. R. Speight. 1997. Diversity of moths in forest plantations and natural forests in Sabah. Bull. Entomol. Res. 87: 371-385.
12. Daily, G. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
13. Dobyns, J. R. 1997. Effects of sampling intensity on the collection of spider (Araneae) species and the estimation of species richness. Environ. Entomol. 26: 150-162.
14. Droege, S., A. Cyr, and J. Larivee. 1998. Checklists: an under-used tool for the inventory and monitoring of plants and animals. Conserv. Biol. 12: 1134-1138.
15. Edwards, P. J., R. M. May, and N. R. Wedd (eds.). 1994. Large scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell, Boston, MA.
16. Erwin, T. 1981. Seasonal and size patterns, trophic structure and richness of Coleoptera in the tropical arboreal ecosystem: the fauna of the tree Luehea seemannii in the canal zone of Panama. Coleopt. Bull. 34: 305-322.
17. Erwin, T. 1982. Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopt. Bull. 36: 74-75.
18. Gaston, K., T. Blackburn, and N. Loder. 1993. Which species are described first? The case of North Am. butterflies. Biodivers. Conserv 4: 119-127.
19. Greenberg, R., and S. Droege. 1999. On the decline of the rusty blackbird and the use of ornithological literature to document long-term population trends. Conserv. Biol. 13: 553-559.
20. Haila, Y., and C. R. Margules. 1996. Survey research in conservation biology. Ecography 19: 323-31.
21. Hammond, P. M. 1994. Practical approaches to the estimation of the extent of biodiversity in speciose groups. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 345: 119-136.
22. Hammond, P.C., and J.C.Miller. 1998. Comparison of the biodiversity of Lepidoptera within three forested ecosystems. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 324-328.
23. Heltsche, J., and N. Forrester. 1983. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39: 1-11.
24. Hodges, R. W., T. Dominick, D. Davis, D. Ferguson, J. Franclemont, E. Munroe, and J. Powell. 1983. The moths of American north of Mexico. Wedge Entomological Foundation, Eugene, OR.
25. Hodges, R. W. 1999. Gelechioidea, Gelechiidae (part), Gelechiinae (part-Chionodes). Fasc. 7: 6. In R. B. Dominick et al [eds.], The moths of America north of Mexico. Wedge Entomological Foundation, Eugene, OR.
26. Humphries, C. J., P. H. Williams, and R. I. Vane-Wright. 1995. Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 93-111.
27. Kerr, J. T., R. Vincent, and D. Currie. 1998. Lepidopteran richness patterns in North America. Ecoscience 5: 448-453.
28. Kress, W. J., W. R. Heyer, P. Acevedo, J. Coddington, D. Cole, T. Erwin, B. Meggers, M. Pogue, R. Thorington, R. Vari, M. Weitzman, and S. Weitzman. 2000. Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1577-1587.
29. Landau, D., D. Prowell, and C. Carlton. 1999. Intensive versus long-term sampling to assess lepidopteran diversity in a southern mixed mesophytic forest. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 435-441.
30. Leps, J., K. Spitzer, and J. Jaros. 1998. Food plants, species composition, and variability of the moth community in an undisturbed forest. Oikos 81: 538-548.
31. Longino, J. T., and R. K. Colwell. 1997. Biodiversity assessment using structured inventory: capturing the ant fauna of a tropical rain forest. Ecol. Appl. 7: 1263-1277.
32. Margules, C. R., A. O. Nicholls, and R. L. Pressey. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43: 63-76.
33. McDunnough J. 1939. Checklist of the Lepidoptera of Canada and the United States of America. Part 2:Microlepidoptera. Mem. S. Calif. Acad. Sci.2: 1-171.
34. McKinney, M. L. 1999. High rates of extinction and threat in poorly studied taxa. Conserv. Biol. 13: 1273-1281.
35. Metzler, E. H. 1980. Annotated checklist and distribution maps of the royal moths and giant silkworm moths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Notes #14. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH.
36. MJM Software Design. 1999. PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4.0.
37. The Nature Conservancy. 1998. Conservation by design: a framework for mission success. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
38. Nekola, J. C., and P. S. White. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26: 867-878.
39. New, T. R. 1999. Limits to species focusing in insect conservation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 853-860.
40. Noss, R., and A. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy. Island Press, Washington, DC.
41. Novotny, V., and Y. Basset. 2000. Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos 89: 564-572.
42. O'Neill, R. V., D. L. DeAngelis, J. B. Wade, and T.F.H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
43. Palmer, M. W. 1990. The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology 71: 1195-1198.
44. Palmer, M. W. 1991. Estimating species richness: the second jackknife reconsidered. Ecology 74: 1512-1513.
45. Palmer M. W. 1993. How should one count species? Nat. Areas J. 15: 124-135.