Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges

Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1978, Pages 121-129

  Libby, Robert ^a   Blashfield, Roger K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000730768     PISSN: 00305073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90044-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. An inequality concerning correlation of composites vs. composites of correlations
2. Linear models in decision making
3. Expert measurement and mechanical combination
4. Unit weighting schemes for decision making
5. Quality of group judgment
6. Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences
7. Man versus model of man: Just how conflicting is that evidence?
8. Man versus model of man: Some conflicting evidence
9. Man versus model of man: The need for a non-linear model
10. A comparison of clinicians with five statistical methods of identifying psychotic MMPI profiles
11. Comparison of rules for aggregating subjective likelihood ratio
12. Man versus model of man revisited: The forecasting of graduate school success
13. The quantification of judgment: Some experimental results
14. The consensus of subjective probability distributions
15. Probabilistic prediction Some experimental results
16. Improving the quality of and aggregating opinions expressed as subjective probability distributions
17. Predicting the decisions of a graduate admissions committee
18. An empirical study of financial judgment models: An individual and group analysis