Future taxonomic partnerships: Reply to Goldstein

Conservation Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 575-576

  Oliver, Ian ^a   Beattie, Andrew J ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000728337     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96393.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. licattic, A. J. 1994. Reply to systematics and biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:227-228.
2. Beattie, A. J., and I. Oliver. 1994. Taxonomic minimalism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:488-490.
3. Browcr, A. V. Z. 1995. Reply to Oliver and Beatlie. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:203.
4. Gaston, K.J., and R. M. May. 1992. Taxonomy and taxonomists. Nature 356:281-282.
5. Longino, J. T., and R. K. Colwell. 1996. Project ALAS. http://viceroy. eeb.uconn.edu/ALAS.html.
6. Novacek, M. J. 1992. The meaning of systematics and the biodiversity crisis. Pages 101-108 in N. Eldredgc, editor. Systematics, ecology and the biodiversity crisis. Columbia University Press, New York.
7. Oliver, I., and A. J. licattie. 1996. Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conservation Biology 10:99-109.
8. Oliver, I., and A. J. Beattie. 1996&. Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications 6:594-607.
9. Rodriguez, C. M. 1996. All taxa biodiversity inventor)' (ATBI). http:// www.inbio.ac.cr/ATBI/ATBI.html.
10. Soûlé, M. E. 1990. The real work of systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 77:4-12.