-
1
-
-
0000848866
-
-
See, for example, A. Laaksonen, V. Talanquer, and D. W. Oxtoby, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 489 (1995).
-
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
, vol.46
, pp. 489
-
-
Laaksonen, A.1
Talanquer, V.2
Oxtoby, D.W.3
-
2
-
-
0000671585
-
-
M. Volmer and A. Weber, Z. Phys. Chem. 119, 277 (1925); R. Becker and W. Döring, Ann. Phys. 24, 719 (1935); J. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 7, 538 (1939).
-
(1925)
Z. Phys. Chem.
, vol.119
, pp. 277
-
-
Volmer, M.1
Weber, A.2
-
3
-
-
84934935637
-
-
M. Volmer and A. Weber, Z. Phys. Chem. 119, 277 (1925); R. Becker and W. Döring, Ann. Phys. 24, 719 (1935); J. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 7, 538 (1939).
-
(1935)
Ann. Phys.
, vol.24
, pp. 719
-
-
Becker, R.1
Döring, W.2
-
4
-
-
3042989611
-
-
M. Volmer and A. Weber, Z. Phys. Chem. 119, 277 (1925); R. Becker and W. Döring, Ann. Phys. 24, 719 (1935); J. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 7, 538 (1939).
-
(1939)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.7
, pp. 538
-
-
Frenkel, J.1
-
5
-
-
33645804341
-
-
H. M. Ellerby and H. Reiss, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5766 (1992); C. L. Weakliem and H. Reiss, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6408 (1994);
-
(1992)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.97
, pp. 5766
-
-
Ellerby, H.M.1
Reiss, H.2
-
6
-
-
0000477419
-
-
H. M. Ellerby and H. Reiss, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5766 (1992); C. L. Weakliem and H. Reiss, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6408 (1994);
-
(1994)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.98
, pp. 6408
-
-
Weakliem, C.L.1
Reiss, H.2
-
14
-
-
0001501887
-
-
G. W. Adams, J. L. Schmitt, and R. A. Zalabsky, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5074 (1984); R. Strey, P. E. Wanger, and T. Schmeling, ibid. 84, 2325 (1986).
-
(1984)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.81
, pp. 5074
-
-
Adams, G.W.1
Schmitt, J.L.2
Zalabsky, R.A.3
-
15
-
-
36549102206
-
-
G. W. Adams, J. L. Schmitt, and R. A. Zalabsky, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5074 (1984); R. Strey, P. E. Wanger, and T. Schmeling, ibid. 84, 2325 (1986).
-
(1986)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.84
, pp. 2325
-
-
Strey, R.1
Wanger, P.E.2
Schmeling, T.3
-
16
-
-
85034550758
-
-
note
-
We note that if validity of the Kelvin relation beyond the limit Δμ → 0 is assumed, the McGraw-Laaksonen scaling relations can be also derived without using the homogeneity ansatz.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
85034555221
-
-
note
-
s) in a range of Δμ between -0.5 and 1.2 in reduced units. The third and fourth order fitting parameters which determine σ″″ and σ are relatively sensitive to the choice of polynomial, compared to the first and second parameters which determine σ′ and σ″. However we confirmed that our conclusions do not depend on the choice of the polynomial. The results given here are obtained by ten-parameter fitting.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
85034529171
-
-
note
-
∞(T) where k is a constant close to 1, holds at least for a range of T near the triple point (Ref. 23).
-
-
-
|