Independence concepts in possibility theory: Part I

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 127-152

  De Campos, Luis M ^a   Huete, Juan F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Hisdal conditioning; Independence; Marginal problem; Possibility theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000688870     PISSN: 01650114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00160-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, H. Prade, Expressing independence in a possibilistic framework and its application to default reasoning, in: A. Cohn (Ed.), 11th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 150-154.
2. L.M. de Campos, Independence relationships in possibility theory and their application to learning belief networks, in: G. Delia Riccia, R. Kruse, R. Viertl (Eds.), Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 363, Springer, Wien, 1995, pp. 119-130.
3. L.M. de Campos, J. Gebhardt, R. Kruse, Axiomatic treatment of possibilistic independence, in: C. Froidevaux, J. Kohlas (Eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 946, Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 77-88.
4. L.M. de Campos, J.F. Huete, Independence concepts in upper and lower probabilities, in: B. Bouchon-Meunier, L. Valverde, R.R. Yager (Eds.), Uncertainty in Intelligent Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 49-59.
5. L.M. de Campos, J.F. Huete, Learning non probabilistic belief networks, in: M. Clarke, R. Kruse, S. Moral (Eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 747, Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 57-64.
6. L.M. de Campos, J.F. Huete, Independence concepts in possibility theory: Part II, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 103 (1999), to appear.
7. L.M. de Campos, J.F. Huete, S. Moral, Possibilistic independence, in: Proc. 3rd European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT), vol. I, 1995, pp. 69-74.
8. L.M. de Campos, M.T. Lamata, S. Moral, The concept of conditional fuzzy measure, Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 5 (1990) 237-246.
9. L.M. de Campos, S. Moral, Independence concepts for convex sets of probabilities, in: P. Besnard, S. Hanks (Eds.), Proc. 11th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan and Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1995, pp. 108-115.
10. G. de Cooman, E.E. Kerre, A new approach to possibilistic independence, in: Proc. 3rd IEEE Internat. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, 1994, pp. 1446-1451.
11. A.D. Dawid, Conditional independence in statistical theory, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 41 (1979) 1-31.
12. A.P. Dempster, Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Ann. Math. Statist. 38 (1967) 325-339.
13. D. Dubois, Belief structures, possibility theory, decomposable confidence measures on finite sets, Comput. Artif. Intell. 5 (1986) 403-417.
14. D. Dubois, L. Farinas del Cerro, A. Herzig, H. Prade, An ordinal view of independence with applications to plausible reasoning, in: R. López de Mántaras, D. Poole (Eds.), Proc. 10th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan and Kaufmann, 1994, pp. 195-203.
15. D. Dubois, H. Prade, Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York, 1988.
16. D. Dubois, H. Prade, Inference in Possibilistic Hypergraphs, in: B. Bouchon-Meunier, R.R. Yager, L.A. Zadeh (Eds.), Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 521, Springer, Berlin, 1990, pp. 250-259.
17. R. Fagin, Multivalued dependencies and a new form for relational databases, ACM Trans. Database Systems 2 (1977) 262-278.
18. L. Farinas del Cerro, A. Herzig, Possibility theory and independence, in: Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge Based Systems, IPMU, 1994, pp. 820-825.
19. P. Fonck, Conditional independence in possibility theory, in: R. López de Mántaras, D. Poole (Eds.), Proc. 10th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan and Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1994, pp. 221-226.
20. E. Hisdal, Conditional possibilities, independence and noninteraction, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1 (1978) 283-297.
21. J.F. Huete, Aprendizaje de Redes de Creencia mediante la Detección de Independencias: Modelos no Probabilisticos, Thesis, Universidad de Granada, Spain, 1995 (in Spanish).
22. R. Kruse, J. Gebhardt, F. Klawonn, Foundations of Fuzzy Systems, Wiley, New York, 1994.
23. S.L. Lauritzen, A.P. Dawid, B.N. Larsen, H.G. Leimer, Independence properties of directed Markov fields, Network 20 (1990) 491-505.
24. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan and Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1988.
25. J. Pearl, D. Geiger, T. Verma, Conditional independence and its representation, Kybernetika 25 (1989) 33-34.
26. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976.
27. P.P. Shenoy, Conditional independence in uncertainty theories, in: D. Dubois, M.P. Wellman, B. D'Ambrosio, P. Smets (Eds.), Proc. 8th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan and Kauffmann, San Mateo, 1992, pp. 284-291.
28. W. Spohn, Stochastic independence, causal independence and shieldability, J. Philos. Logic 9 (1980) 73-99.
29. M: Studený, Attempts at axiomatic description of conditional independence, Kybernetika 25 (1989) 72-79.
30. M. Studený, Formal properties of conditional independence in different calculi of A.I., in: M. Clarke, R. Kruse, S. Moral (Eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 747, Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 341-348.
31. M. Sugeno, Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications, Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan, 1974.
32. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1 (1978) 3-28.