Rapid detection of Salmonella Typhimurium in chicken carcass wash water using an immunoelectrochemical method

Journal of Food Protection

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1043-1048

  Che, Yi Hua ^a   Li, Yanbin ^a   Slavik, Michael ^b   Paul, David ^b  

^a 3202 Bell Engineering Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPEROMETRIC ENZYME ELECTRODE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BUFFER; CENTRIFUGATION; CHICKEN; FILTRATION; MAGNETIC SEPARATION; MONOPHENOL MONOOXYGENASE; PH; WATER;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI; GALLUS GALLUS; LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; TYPHIMURIUM;

EID: 0000685141     PISSN: 0362028X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-63.8.1043     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bailey, J. S. 1998. Detection of Salmonella cells within 24 to 26 hours in poultry samples with the polymerase chain reaction BAX system. J. Food Prot. 61:782-795.
2. Blackburn, C. de W. 1993. A review, rapid and alternative methods for the detection of Salmonella in foods. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 75:199-214.
3. Blais, B. W., E. Pietrzak, D. Oudit, C. Wilson, L. M. Phillippe, and J. Howlett. 1998. Polymacron enzyme immunoassay system for detection of naturally contaminating Salmonella in foods, feeds, and environmental samples. J. Food Prot. 61:1187-1190.
4. Brewster, J. D., A. G. Gehring, R. S. Mazenko, L. Van houten, and C. J. Crawford. 1996. Immunoelectrochemical assay for bacteria: use of epifluorescence microscopy and rapid-scan electrochemical techniques in development of an assay for Salmonella. Anal. Chem. 68: 4153-4159.
5. Brooks, J. L., B. Mirhabibollahi, and R. G. Kroll. 1992. Experimental enzyme-linked amperometric immunosensors for the detection of Salmonella in foods. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 73:189-196.
6. Bryan, F. L., and M. P. Doyle. 1995. Health risks and consequences of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni in raw poultry. J. Food Prot. 58:326-344.
7. CAST. 1994. Foodborne pathogens: risk and consequences. Task force report 2. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa.
8. Che, Y. H., Z. Yang, Y. Li, D. Paul, and M. Slavik. 1999. Rapid detection of Salmonella Typhimurium using an immunoelectrochemical method coupled with immunomagnetic separation. J. Rapid Methods Automat. Microbiol. 7:47-59.
9. Flowers, R. S., J. D'Aoust, W. H. Andrews, and J. S. Bailey. 1992. Salmonella, p. 371-422. In C. Vanderzant and D. F. Splittstoesser (ed.), Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods, 3rd ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
10. Gouws, P. A., M. Visser, and V. Brozel. 1998. A polymerase chain reaction procedure for the detection of Salmonella spp. within 24 hours. J. Food Prot. 61:1039-1042.
11. Marranzano, M., A. Castagan, S. Pitrolo, A. Ursino, and L. Mauro. 1997. Use of hybridization assay and direct immuno assay for detection of Salmonella spp. in surface waters and a comparison with conventional culture procedure. Microbiologica 20:283-287.
12. McElroy, A. P., N. D. Cohen, and B. M. Hargis. 1996. Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis in experimentally inoculated eggs and eggs from experimentally challenge hens. J. Food Prot. 59:1273-1278.
13. Molla, B., J. Kleer, and H. Sinell. 1997. Coupling of immunomagnetic separation and ELISA for the rapid detection of Salmonella in foods. Fleischwirtschaften 76:823-825.
14. Ortega, F., E. Dominguez, E. Burestedt, J. Emneus, L. Gorton, and G. M. Varga. 1994. Phenol oxidase-based biosensors as selective detection units in column liquid chromatography for the determination of phenolic compounds. J. Chromatogr. A(675):65-78.
15. Peeler, J. T., G. A. Houghtly, and A. P. Rainosek. 1992. The most probable number technique, p. 105-120. In C. Vanderzant and D. F. Splittstoesser (ed.), Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods, 3rd ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
16. Quinn, C., J. Ward, M. Griffin, D. Yearsley, and J. Egan. 1995. A comparison of conventional culture and three rapid methods for the detection of Salmonella in poultry feeds and environmental samples. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 20:89-91.
17. Ripabelli, G., M. L. Sammarco, A. Ruberto, G. Iannitto, and G. M. Grasso. 1997. Immunomagnetic separation and conventional culture procedure for detection of naturally occurring Salmonella in raw pork sausage and chicken meat. Lett. Appl. Micriobiol. 24:493-497.
18. Rishpon, J., and D. Ivnitski. 1997. An amperometric enzyme-channel immunoassay. Biosensors & Bioelectron. 12:195-204.
19. Scheu, P., A. Gasch, R. Zschaler, K. Berghof, and F. Wilborn. 1998. Evaluation of a PCR-ELISA for food testing: detection of selected Salmonella serovars in confectionery products. Food Biotechnol. 12: 1-12.
20. Seo, K. H., R. E. Brackett, N. F. Hartman, and D. P. Campbell. 1999. Development of a rapid response biosensor for detection of Salmonella Typhimurium. J. Food Prot. 62:431-437.
21. Shaw, S. J., B. W. Blais, and D. C. Nundy. 1998. Performance of the dynabeads anti-Salmonella system in the detection of Salmonella species in foods, animal feeds, and environmental samples. J. Food Prot. 61:1507-1510.
22. Tian, H., T. Miyamoto, T. Okabe, Y. Kuramitsu, and S. Hatano. 1996. Rapid detection of Salmonella spp. in foods by combination of new selective enrichment and a sandwich ELISA using two monoclonal antibodies against dulcitol 1-phosphate dehydrogenase. J. Food Prot. 59:1158-1163.
23. Wyatt, G. M., H. A. Lee, S. Dionysiou, M. R. A. Morgan, D. J. Stokely, A. H. Al-Hajji, J. Richards, A. J. Silles, and P. H. Jones. 1995. Comparison of a microtitration plate ELISA with a standard culture procedure for the detection of Salmonella spp. in chicken. J. Food Prot. 59:238-243.