New energy partitioning scheme based on the self-consistent charge and configuration method for subsystems: Application to water dimer system

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1623-1633

  Korchowiec, Jacek ^a   Guminski K ^b   Uchimaru, Tadafumi ^a  

^a NATL INST OF MAT AND CHEM RES   (Japan)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000683354     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.480729     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. R. J. Bartlett, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 32, 359 (1981).
2. J. A. Pople, J. S. Binkley, and R. Seeger, Int. J. Quantum Chem. S10, 1 (1976).
3. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys. 19, 553 (1970).
4. R. McWeeny, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 253, 242 (1959).
5. J. N. Murrell, M. Randiæ, and D. R. Williams, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 284, 566 (1964).
6. J. I. Musher and A. T. Amos, Phys. Rev. 164, 31 (1967).
7. K. Fukui and H. Fujimoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 41, 1989 (1968).
8. K. Szalewicz and B. Jeziorski, Mol. Phys. 38, 191 (1979).
9. C. Hayes and J. Stone, Mol. Phys. 53, 83 (1984).
10. G. Chalasiñski and M. Gutowski, Chem. Rev. 88, 943 (1988).
11. G. Chalasiñski and M. M. Szczêœniak, Mol. Phys. 63, 205 (1988).
12. B. Jeziorski, R. Moszynski, and K. Szalewicz, Chem. Rev. 94, 1887 (1994).
13. G. Chalasiñski and M. M. Szczêœniak, Chem. Rev. 94, 1723 (1994).
14. S. Rybak, B. Jeziorski, and K. Szalewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6576 (1991).
15. P. A. Kollman and L. C. Allen, Theor. Chim. Acta 18, 399 (1970).
16. M. Dreyfus and A. Pullman, Theor. Chim. Acta 19, 20 (1970).
17. K. Morokuma, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 1237 (1971).
18. S. Iwata and K. Morokuma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95, 7563 (1973).
19. W. A. Latham, G. R. Pack, and K. Morokuma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 6625 (1975).
20. H. Umeyama, K. Kitaura, and K. Morokuma, Chem. Phys. Lett. 36, 11 (1975).
21. S. Yamabe and K. Morokuma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 4458 (1975).
22. K. Kitaura and K. Morokuma, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 10, 325 (1976).
23. K. Morokuma, Acc. Chem. Res. 10, 294 (1977).
24. W. J. Stevens and W. H. Fink, Chem. Phys. Lett. 139, 15 (1987).
25. A. E. Reed and F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 4066 (1983).
26. L. A. Curtiss, D. J. Pochatko, A. E. Reed, and F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2679 (1985).
27. A. E. Reed, F. Weinhold, L. A. Curtiss, and D. J. Pochatko, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 5687 (1986).
28. A. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, and F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev. 88, 899 (1988).
29. S. Nagase, T. Fueno, S. Yamabe, and K. Kitaura, Theor. Chim. Acta 49, 309 (1978).
30. W. A. Sokalski, S. Roszak, P. C. Hariharan, and J. J. Kaufman, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 23, 847 (1983).
31. G. Alagona, R. Cammi, C. Ghio, and J. Tomasi, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 35, 223 (1989).
32. R. F. Frey and E. R. Davidson, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5555 (1989).
33. J. C. White and E. R. Davidson, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 8029 (1990).
34. I. Røeggen and T. Dahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 511 (1992).
35. I. Røeggen, Chem. Phys. 162, 271 (1992).
36. T. Komatsuzaki and I. Ohmine, Chem. Phys. 180, 239 (1994).
37. W. Chen and M. S. Gordon, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 14316 (1996).
38. E. D. Glendening and A. Streitwieser, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2900 (1994).
39. E. D. Glendening, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 2473 (1996).
40. G. K. Schenter and E. D. Glendening, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 17152 (1996).
41. A. J. Sadlej, Mol. Phys. 39, 1249 (1980).
42. W. A. Sokalski, S. M. Roszak, and K. Pecul, Chem. Phys. Lett. 153, 153 (1988).
43. M. Gutowski and L. Piela, Mol. Phys. 64, 337 (1988).
44. W. A. Sokalski and S. M. Roszak, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 234, 387 (1991).
45. J. Korchowiec and T. Uchimaru, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 6682 (1998).
46. R. F. Nalewajski and J. Korchowiec, Charge Sensitivity Approach to Electronic Structure and Chemical Reactivity (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).
47. R. F. Nalewajski, J. Korchowiec, and A. Michalak, Top. Curr. Chem. 183, 25 (1996).
48. B. G. Baekelandt, W. J. Mortier, and R. A. Schoonheydt, Structure and Bonding: Chemical Hardness, edited by K. Sen (Springer, Heidelberg, 1993), pp. 187-227.
49. R. T. Sanderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 272 (1952).
50. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
51. The global or inter-reactant equilibrium can be characterized not only by chemical potential equalization equation(s) but also by the corresponding hardness equalization equation(s). For details, see Ref. 46.
52. J. Korchowiec and T. Uchimaru, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 10167 (1998).
53. J. Korchowiec, A. K. Chandra, T. Uchimaru, S. Kawahara, K. Matsumura, S. Tsuzuki, and M. Mikami, Chem. Phys. Lett. 308, 229 (1999).
54. Equation (4) is general, so it is not restricted to any computational scheme. The constant external potential means that the positions of nuclei are fixed. In SCCCMS calculations, due to approximate inter-reactant potential, the constraint of fixed external potential is connected with constant effective electrostatic potential.
55. This is true for internally stable systems. For details, see Chap. 4.7 in Ref. 46.
56. R. Ditchfield, W. J. Hehre, and A. J. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 724 (1971).
57. W. J. Hehre, R. Ditchfield, and A. J. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2257 (1972).
58. P. C. Hariharan and A. J. Pople, Mol. Phys. 27, 209 (1974).
59. P. C. Hariharan and A. J. Pople, Theor. Chim. Acta 28, 213 (1973).
60. M. S. Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 76, 163 (1980).
61. T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007 (1989).
62. A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund, Modern Quantum Chemistry (Macmillan, New York, 1982).
63. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993).
64. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988).
65. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988).
66. B. Miehlich, A. Savin, H. Stoll, and H. Preuss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 200 (1989).
67. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez, and J. A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 94/DFT, Revision D.I; Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
68. B. H. Besler, K. M. Merz, Jr., and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem. 11, 431 (1990).
69. U. C. Singh and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem. 5, 129 (1984).
70. The charges were derived from the density matrix for the computational level utilized. However, the post-HF SCCCMS approaches, except for MP2 approaches, the charges were derived from the SCF(HF) densities.
71. S. S. Xantheas and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 98, 8037 (1993).
72. S. S. Xantheas and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8774 (1993).
73. The EX repulsion energy is the sum of a pure exchange (electron-electron effect) and repulsion energy (electron-electron, electron-nuclear, and electron kinetic effects). The latter dominates the former for the closed-shell systems. Such defined EX is equivalent to that from the Heitler-London theory.
74. A. P. L. Rendell, G. B. Bacskay, and N. S. Hush, Chem. Phys. Lett. 117, 400 (1985).
75. A. J. Stone, Chem. Phys. Lett. 211, 101 (1993).
76. D. Buckingham and P. W. Fowler, Can. J. Chem. 63, 2018 (1985).
77. S.-Y. Liu and C. E. Dykstra, Chem. Phys. 107, 343 (1986).
78. The CT energy in Ref. 23 was defined by the balance equation. Thus, it included the mixed term.
79. 3.