Comments on coupling graphical and regression analyses of ligand effect data

Organometallics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 295-301

  Bartholomew, Joshua ^a   Fernandez, Anthony L ^a   Lorsbach, Beth A ^a   Wilson, Matthew R ^a   Prock, Alfred ^a   Giering, Warren P ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000680146     PISSN: 02767333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/om950564p     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wilson, M. R.; Woska, D. C.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1993, 12, 1742.
2. Lorsbach, B. A.; Bennett, D. M.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1995, 14, 869.
3. Lorsbach, B. A.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1995, 14, 1694.
4. Farrar, D. H.; Poë, A. J.; Zhang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6252.
5. Bartholomew, J.; Bennett, D. M.; Chakar, F.; Fernandez, A. L.; Giering, W. P.; Lorsbach, B. A.; Prock, A.; Wilson, M. R. Unpublished results.
6. Bartik, T.; Himmler, T.; Schulte, H.; Seevogel, K. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 272, 29.
7. ar tends to give the highest quality analyses of the data based on eq 1.
8. White, D. P.; Brown, T. L. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 2718 and references therein.
9. White, D.; Coville, N. J. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1994, 36, 95 and references therein.
10. Tolman, C. A. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313.
11. Fernandez, A. L.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1994, 13, 2767.
12. Tracey, A. A.; Eriks, K.; Prock.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1990, 9, 1399.
13. 3).
14. 2 value and the coefficients of the extraneous parameters have unacceptably large standard errors.
15. Golovin, M. N.; Rahman, M. M.; Belmonte, J. E.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1985, 4, 1981.
16. Dahlinger, K.; Falcone, F.; Poë, A. J. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 2654.
17. Eriks, E.; Liu, H.-L.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1759.
18. Steric sensitivity is defined as the derivative, d(property)/dθ, after the steric threshold.
19. Chen, L.; Poë, A. J. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 3641.
20. Poë, A. J. Unpublished results.
21. Hetflejes, J.; Mares, F.; Chvalovsky, V. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1972, 37, 1713.
22. Rahman, M. M.; Liu, H.-L.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1987, 6, 650.
23. Bodner, G. M.; May, M. P.; MeKinney Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1951.
24. Schafer, W.; Schweig, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11, 836.
25. Lappert, M. F.; Pedley, J. B.; Wilkins, B. T.; Stelzer, O.; Unger, E. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1975, 1207.
26. Debies, T. P.; Rablais, J. W. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 308.
27. Weiner, M. A.; Lattman, M.; Grim, S. O. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 1292.
28. Boek, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1975, 44, 343.
29. Ikuta S.; Kebarle, P.; Bancroft, G. M.; Chan, T.; Puddephatt, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3699.
30. Stelzer, O.; Unger, E. Chem. Ber. 1975, 108, 1246.
31. Puddephatt, R. J.; Dignard-Bailey, L.; Bancroft, G. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1985, 96, L91.
32. 3 ligands, is treated as an outlier and is not included in this analysis.
33. ar according to eq 1 with coefficient b set to zero. With or without a steric threshold, the analysis is not as good as that obtained with θ as the steric parameter.
34. 2. The coefficients and their 95% confidence limits are a = -0.73 ± 0.22, b′ = -0.461 ± 0.057, c = -1.69 ± 0.75, and d = 46.3 ± 1.8.
35. Henderson, W. A.; Buckler, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 5794.