ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists

Journal of Applied Statistics

Volumn 22, Issue 5-6, 1995, Pages 817-834

  Clobert, J ^b  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000679402     PISSN: 02664763     EISSN: 13600532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02664769524649     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boyce, M.S. (1988) Bet hedging in avian life histories. In: oullet (Ed.), Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, pp. 2131–2139 (Ottawa, Ottawa University Press).
2. Caswell, H. (1989) Matrix Population Models (Sunderland, MA, Sinauer).
3. Cazelles, B. & Ferriere, R. (1992) How predictable is chaos?, Nature, 355, pp. 25–26.
4. Clobert, J. & Lebreton, J.-D. (1991) Estimation of demographic parameters in bird populations. In: C.M. Perrins, J.-D. Lebreton & G.J.M. Hirons (Eds), Bird Population Studies: Relevance to Conservation and Management, pp. 75–104 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
5. Clobert, J., Massot, M., Lecomte, J., Sorci, G., De Fraipont, M. & Barbault, R. (1994) Determinants of dispersal behaviour: The common lizard as a case study. In: L.J. Vitt & E.R. Pianica (Eds) Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives, pp. 183–206 (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
6. Clobert, J. & Leruth, Y. (1983) La gestion des populations d’Etourneaux en Belgique. Etude d’une nouvelle technique de limitation des effectifs, Acta OEcologica, OEcologia applicata, 4, pp. 199–210.
7. Clutton-brock, T.H. (Ed.) (1988) Reproductive Success. Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
8. Hassel, M.P. (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey Systems (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
9. Knuth, D.E. (1973) The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. I, 2nd edn (Reading, MA, Addison–Wesley).
10. Knuth, D.E. (1973) The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2, 2nd edn (Reading, MA, Addison–Wesley).
11. Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J. & Anderson, D.R. (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: Case studies and recent advances, Ecological Monographs, 62, pp. 67–118.
12. Lebreton, J.-D. & Gonzalez–Davila, G. (1993) An introduction to models of subdivided populations, Journal of Biological Systems, 1, pp. 389–-423.
13. Legendre, S., Clobert, J. & Ferriere, R. (1993) ULM (Unified Life Models) User's Manual (Paris, Laboratoire d’Ecologie, ENS).
14. Leslie, P.H. (1945) On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics, Biometrika, 33, pp. 183–212.
15. Lovelock, J.E. & Watson, A.J. (1983) Biological homeostasis of the global environment: the parable of Daisyworld, Tellus, 35 B, pp. 284–289.
16. Mcdonald, D.B. & Caswell, H. (1993) Matrix methods for avian demography. In: D. M. power (Ed.), Current Ornithology, Vol. 10, pp. 139–185 (New York, Plenum Press).
17. Newton, I. (Ed.) (1989) Lifetime Reproduction in Birds (London, Academic Press).
18. Parker, G.A. & Maynard-Smith, J. (1990) Optimality theory in evolutionary biology, Nature, 348, pp. 27–33.
19. Press, H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T. (1988) Numerical Recipes (Cambridge, NY, Cambridge University Press).
20. Pulliam, H.R. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation, The American Naturalist, 132, pp. 652–661.
21. Tuljapurkar, S. (1990) Population Dynamics in Variable Environments, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics (Berlin, Heidelberg Germany, Springer–Verlag).