Renormalization-group resummation of a divergent series of the perturbative wave functions of the quantum anharmonic oscillator

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 1998, Pages R2035-R2039

  Kunihiro, Teiji ^a  

^a RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000678839     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.R2035     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).
2. N. Goldenfeld, O. Martin, and Y. Oono, J. Sci. Comput. 4, 4 (1989).
3. N. Goldenfeld, O. Martin, Y. Oono, and F. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1361 (1990).
4. N. D. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992).
5. L. Y. Chen, N. Goldenfeld, Y. Oono, and G. Paquette, Physica A 204, 111 (1994).
6. G. Paquette, L. Y. Chen, N. Goldenfeld, and Y. Oono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 76 (1994).
7. Phys. Rev. Lett.L.-Y. Chen, N. Goldenfeld, and Y. Oono, 73, 1311 (1994).
8. L.-Y. ChenN. GoldenfeldY. OonoPhys. Rev. E 54, 376 (1996).
9. For recent developments, see for example, R. Graham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2185 (1996).
10. S. Sasa, Physica D 108, 45 (1997).
11. K. Matsuba and K. Nozaki, patt-sol/9702001, patt-sol/9703004.
12. H. J. de Vega and J. F. J Salgado, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6524 (1997).
13. T. Kunihiro, Prog. Theor. Phys. 94, 503 (1995).
14. Prog. Theor. Phys.T. Kunihiro95, 835(E) (1996).
15. T. Kunihiro, Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 14, 51 (1997).
16. Prog. Theor. Phys. 97, 179 (1997).
17. see also, a comprehensive review; T. Kunihiro, patt-sol/9709003, which is a refinement of the argument given in the previous papers where the fact that the RG method is a theory manipulating initial conditions were not fully recognized.
18. Large Order Behavior of Perturbation Theory, edited by J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Current Physics—Sources and Comments, Vol. 7 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990).
19. G. A. Arteca, F. M. Fernández, and E. A. Castro, Large Order Perturbation Theory and Summation Methods in Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).
20. C. M. Bender and L. M. A. Bettencourt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4114 (1996).
21. C. M. BenderL. M. A. BettencourtPhys. Rev. D 54, 7710 (1996).
22. We are aware that MSPT was applied to quantum mechanical problems earlier by Frasca; M. Frasca, Nuovo Cimento B 107, 915 (1992).
23. Nuovo Cimento BM. Frasca109, 603 (1994).
24. C. A. Ginsburg and E. W. Montroll, J. Math. Phys. 19, 336 (1978).
25. I. L. Egusquiza and M. A. Valle Basagoiti, Report No. hep-th/9611143, 1996.
26. M. Frasca, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1548 (1997).
27. For example, see R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics II Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1995).
28. hep-th/9602024.
29. V. F. Kovalev, V. V. Pustovalov, and D. V. Shirkov, hep-th/9706056, J. Math. Phys. (to be published).
30. C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 184, 1231 (1969).
31. C. M. BenderT. T. WuPhys. Rev. D 7, 1620 (1973).
32. The following is some of recent articles from which one can trace the enormous number of references related to this method; C. Arvanitis, H. F. Jones, and C. S. Parker, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3704 (1995).
33. W. Janke and H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2787 (1995).
34. Phys. Rev. Lett.E. J. Weniger, 77, 2859 (1996).
35. H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistical and Polymer Physics, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
36. T. Hatsuda, T. Kunihiro, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3229 (1997).
37. see also S. K. Kauffman and S. M. Perez, J. Phys. A 17, 2027 (1984).