Toy model for breaking super gauge theories at the effective Lagrangian level

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 170-179

  Sannino, Francesco ^a,b   Schechter, Joseph ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000671372     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.170     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6857 (1994).
2. N. SeibergNucl. Phys. B435, 129 (1995).
3. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B426, 19 (1994).
4. Nucl. Phys.N. SeibergE. WittenB430, 495(E) (1994).
5. Nucl. Phys.N. SeibergE. WittenB431, 484 (1994).
6. K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, in String Theory, Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity, Proceedings of the Spring School, Trieste, Italy, 1995, edited by R. Dijkgraaf et al. [Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 45B, C, 1 (1996)].
7. M. E. Peskin, “Duality in Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory” (TASI 96): Fields, Strings, and Duality, Boulder, CO, 1996, hep-th/9702094.
8. P. Di Vecchia, Surv. High Energy Phys. 10, 119 (1997).
9. G. Veneziano and S. Yankielowicz, Phys. Lett. 113B, 321 (1982).
10. T. R. Taylor, G. Veneziano, and S. Yankielowicz, Nucl. Phys. B218, 493 (1983).
11. I. Affleck, M. Dine, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B241, 493 (1984).
12. Nucl. Phys.I. AffleckM. DineN. SeibergB256, 557 (1985).
13. D. Amati, K. Konishi, Y. Meurice, G. C. Rossi, and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rep. 162, 169 (1988).
14. V. Novikov, M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and V. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B260, 157 (1985).
15. A. Masiero and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B249, 593 (1985).
16. A. Masiero, R. Pettorino, M. Roncadelli, and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B261, 633 (1985).
17. O. Aharony, J. Sonnenshein, M. E. Peskin, and S. Yankielowicz, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6157 (1995).
18. N. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, Phys. Lett. B 404, 77 (1997).
19. N. EvansS. D. H. HsuM. SchwetzNucl. Phys. B484, 124 (1997).
20. N. EvansS. D. H. HsuM. Schwetz“Lattice Tests of Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” hep-th/9707260.
21. N. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, M. Schwetz, and S. B. Selipsky, Nucl. Phys. B456, 205 (1995).
22. L. Alvarez-Gaume and M. Marino, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 975 (1997).
23. Int. J. Mod. Phys. AL. Alvarez-Gaume, J. Distler, C. Kounnas, M. Marino, 11, 4745 (1996).
24. L. Alvarez-Gaume, M. Marino, and F. Zamora, “Softly Broken (Formula presented) QCD with Massive Quark Hypermultiplets,” hep-th/9703072 and hep-th/9707017.
25. T. De Grand, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and J. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2066 (1975).
26. M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and V. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385 (1979).
27. Nucl. Phys.M. ShifmanA. VainshteinV. ZakharovB147, 448 (1979).
28. J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992).
29. S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979).
30. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
31. J. GasserH. LeutwylerNucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
32. A recent review is given by Ulf-G. Meissner, Rep. Prog. Phys. 56, 903 (1993).
33. S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B87, 207 (1975).
34. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B202, 513 (1981).
35. A. Kovner and M. Shifman, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2396 (1997).
36. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B104, 445 (1976).
37. Nucl. Phys.E. WittenB122, 109 (1977).See also Shifman et al. in 16.
38. J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3393 (1980).
39. C. Rosenzweig, J. Schechter, and G. Trahern, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3388 (1980).
40. P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B171, 253 (1980).
41. E. Witten, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 128, 363 (1980).
42. P. Nath and A. Arnowitt, Phys. Rev. D 23, 473 (1981).
43. A. Aurilia, Y. Takahashi, and D. Townsend, Phys. Lett. 95B, 265 (1980).
44. K. Kawarabayashi and N. Ohta, Nucl. Phys. B175, 477 (1980).
45. A. A. Migdal and M. A. Shifman, Phys. Lett. 114B, 445 (1982).
46. J. M. Cornwall and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1424 (1984).
47. Phys. Rev. DJ. M. CornwallA. Soni32, 764 (1985).
48. A. Salomone, J. Schechter, and T. Tudron, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1143 (1981).
49. J. Ellis and J. Lanik, Phys. Lett. 150B, 289 (1985).
50. Phys. Lett.H. Gomm and J. Schechter, 158B, 449 (1985).
51. H. Gomm, P. Jain, R. Johnson, and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 33, 801 (1986).
52. H. Gomm, P. Jain, R. Johnson, and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3476 (1986).
53. Actually a QCD Lagrangian with a similar “holomorphic” piece plus a needed non holomorphic piece was discussed in Sec. VII of Ref. 27. This was partly motivated by a complex form for the two QCD coupling parameters which had been speculated in J. Schechter, Proceedings of the third annual MRST meeting, University of Rochester, 1981.