-
4
-
-
3342938754
-
-
Phys. Rev. Lett.F.J.P Schuurmans, D.T.N. de Lang, G.H. Wegdam, R. Sprik, and A. Lagendijk, 80, 5077 (1998)
-
(1998)
, vol.80
, pp. 5077
-
-
de Lang, D.T.N.1
Wegdam, G.H.2
Sprik, R.3
Lagendijk, A.4
-
5
-
-
0031185632
-
-
Phys. Rev. Lett.A. Lagendijk, B. Nienhuis, B.A. van Tiggelen, and P. de Vries, 79, 657 (1997)
-
(1997)
, vol.79
, pp. 657
-
-
Lagendijk, A.1
Nienhuis, B.2
van Tiggelen, B.A.3
de Vries, P.4
-
10
-
-
0000958073
-
-
J.J. Maki, M.S. Malcuit, J.E. Sipe, and R.W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 972 (1991)
-
(1991)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.67
, pp. 972
-
-
Maki, J.J.1
Malcuit, M.S.2
Sipe, J.E.3
Boyd, R.W.4
-
11
-
-
27944464478
-
-
J.J. Maki, W.V. Davis, R.W. Boyd, and J.E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. A 46, 7155 (1992).
-
(1992)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.46
, pp. 7155
-
-
Maki, J.J.1
Davis, W.V.2
Boyd, R.W.3
Sipe, J.E.4
-
15
-
-
0030264184
-
-
V.A. Sautenkov, H. van Kampen, E.R. Eliel, and J.P. Woerdman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3327 (1996).
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.77
, pp. 3327
-
-
Sautenkov, V.A.1
van Kampen, H.2
Eliel, E.R.3
Woerdman, J.P.4
-
16
-
-
0001206862
-
-
M.P. Hehlen, H.U. Güdel, Q. Shu, J. Rai, S. Rai, and S.C. Rand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1103 (1994)
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.73
, pp. 1103
-
-
Hehlen, M.P.1
Güdel, H.U.2
Shu, Q.3
Rai, J.4
Rai, S.5
Rand, S.C.6
-
20
-
-
0028481290
-
-
A.S. Manka, J.P. Dowling, C.M. Bowden, and M. Fleischhauer, Quantum Opt. 6, 371 (1994).
-
(1994)
Quantum Opt.
, vol.6
, pp. 371
-
-
Manka, A.S.1
Dowling, J.P.2
Bowden, C.M.3
Fleischhauer, M.4
-
23
-
-
0000336509
-
-
H. van Kampen, V.A. Sautenkov, A.M. Shalagin, E.R. Eliel, and J.P. Woerdman, Phys. Rev. A 56, 3569 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.56
, pp. 3569
-
-
van Kampen, H.1
Sautenkov, V.A.2
Shalagin, A.M.3
Eliel, E.R.4
Woerdman, J.P.5
-
24
-
-
85037183406
-
-
The shift (Formula presented) is not exactly equal to the shift in (Formula presented) because of the nonlinearity of the relation between the reflectivity (Formula presented) and the dielectric coefficient (Formula presented) This difference is about 2%, which is small compared to our experimental accuracy
-
The shift (Formula presented) is not exactly equal to the shift in (Formula presented) because of the nonlinearity of the relation between the reflectivity (Formula presented) and the dielectric coefficient (Formula presented) This difference is about 2%, which is small compared to our experimental accuracy.
-
-
-
|