Stated choice models for predicting the impact of user fees at public recreation sites

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 300-324

  Schroeder, Herbert W ^a,c   Louviere, Jordan ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice models; Fees; Logit; Recreation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000642077     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1999.11949869     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64-75.
2. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271-292.
3. Anderson, D. A., & Louviere, J. J. (1993). Factors affecting user choice of National Forest Recreation Sites (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station). Laramie, WY: The University of Wyoming, Department of Statistics.
4. Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J., Stankey, G. H., & Gregoire, T. G. (1987). The ROS planning system: Evolution, basic concepts, and research needs. Leisure Sciences, 9, 201-212.
5. Dwyer, J. F., Schroeder, H. W., Louviere, J. J., & Anderson, D. H. (1989). Urbanites' willingness to pay for trees and forests in recreation areas. Journal of Arboriculture, 15, 247-252.
6. Gable, R., Chavez, D. & Short, R. (1997). Pilot fee demonstration project evaluation: Visitor survey's on the Enterprise Zone, phase 1 - before fee implementation. Cooperative research report, PSW-96-0025CA. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University.
7. Green, P. E. (1974). On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 61-68.
8. Louviere, J. J. (1988). Analyzing decision making: metric conjoint analysis (Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Louviere, J. J. & Anderson, D. A. (1994). External validity tests of experimental choice models: Choice of ski areas located in National Forest Areas of the Wasatch Front in Utah (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business.
10. Louviere, J. J., Louviere, C. H., Anderson, D. A., & Woodworth, G. G. (1986). Choices among parks and forest preserves by Chicago area users: A study of the effects of managerially relevant park attributes on choice (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Department of Geography.
11. Louviere, J. & Timmermans, H. (1990). Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research: A review. Leisure Sciences, 12, 9-32.
12. More, T. A., Dustin, D. L., & Knopf, R. C. (1996). Behavioral consequences of campground user fees. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14, 81-93.
13. Recreational Fee Demonstration Program. (1998). Progress Report to Congress, Volume I - Overview and Summary. U. S. Department of the Interior & U. S. Department of Agriculture.
14. Schroeder, H. W., Dwyer, J. F., Louviere, J. J., & Anderson, D. H. (1990). Monetary and non-monetary trade-offs of urban forest site attributes in a logit model of recreation choice. In B. L. Driver & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), Forest resource value and benefit measurement: Some cross-cultural perspectives (General Technical Report RM-197, pp. 41-51). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
15. Stynes, D. J. & Peterson, G. L. (1984). A review of logit models with implications for modeling recreation choices. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 295-310.
16. Timmermans, H., & van der Heijden, R. (1987). Uncovering spatial decision-making processes: A decision net approach applied to recreational choice behaviour. Tijdschrift voor Econ. en Soc. Geografie, 78, 297-304.
17. Vining, J., & Fishwick, L. (1991). An exploratory study of outdoor recreation site choices. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 114-132.
18. Zinkhan, F. C., Holmes, T. P., & Mercer, D. E. (1997). Conjoint analysis: A preference-based approach for the accounting of multiple benefits in southern forest management. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 21, 180-186.