Ordering work blue-collar literacy and the political nature of genre

Written Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 155-184

  Winsor, Dorothy A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000632028     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088300017002001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amerine, R., & Bilmes, J. (1990). Following instructions. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientiflcpractice (pp. 323-335). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Barley, S. R., & Orr, J. E. (1997). Introduction: The neglected workforce. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings (pp. 1-19). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 29-308.
4. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/poieer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Blakeslee, A. M., Cole, C. M., & Conefrey, T. (1996). Evaluating qualitative inquiry in technical and scientific communication: Toward a practical and dialogic validity. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5,12-149.
6. Chin, E. (1994). Redefining "context" in research on writing. Written Communication, 11, 44-182.
7. Cross, G. A. (1994). Collaboration and conflict: A contextual exploration of group writing and positive emphasis. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
8. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.)New York: Random House.
9. Freedman, A., & Medvvay, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In. A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 1-20). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
10. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory ofstructuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Hull, G. (1997). Hearing other voices: A critical assessment of popular views on literacy and work. In G. Hull (Ed.), Changing work, changing workers: Critical perspectives on language, literacy and skills (pp. 3-39). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Hull, G. (1999). What's in a label? Complicating notions of the skills-poor worker. Writlen Communication, 16,37-411.
13. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
15. Marvin, C. (1988). Wlien old technologies were new: Thinking about electrical communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70,15-167.
17. Mukerji, C. (1996). The collective construction of scientific genius. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 257-278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Fare, A. (1993). Discourse regulation and the production of knowledge. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 111-123). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
19. Sauer, B. (1998). Embodied knowledge: The textual representation of embodied sensory information in a dynamic and uncertain material environment. Written Communication, 15,13-169.
20. Schryer, C. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10,20-234.
21. Shapin, S. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77,55-563.
22. Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank's response to its executives' expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Sullivan, F. J. (1997). Dysfunctional workers, functional texts: The transformation of work in institutional procedure manuals. Written Communication, 14,31-359.
24. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis-.Englishinacademicandresearchsettings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Vincenti, W. G. (1990). Wlwt engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Whalley, P., & Barley, S. R. (1997). Technical work in the division of labor: Stalking the wily anomaly. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings (pp. 23-52). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27. Winsor, D. A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Winsor, D. A. (1998). Rhetorical practices in technical work. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12,34-370.
29. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.