Human-Computer Interaction: Input Devices

ACM Computing Surveys

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 177-179

  Jacob, Robert J K ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000624752     PISSN: 03600300     EISSN: 15577341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/234313.234387     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bolt, R. A. 1981. Gaze-orchestrated dynamic windows. Comput. Graph. 15 3 (Aug) 109-119.
2. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. 1983. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
3. Foley, J. D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K., and Hughes, J. F. 1990. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. Addison-wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., Norman, D. A. 1986. Direct manipulation interfaces. In User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction. D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 87-124.
5. Jacob, R. J. K. 1991. The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: What you look at is what you get. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 9 3 (April), 152-169.
6. MacKinlay, J. D., Card, S. K., and Robertson, G. G. 1990. A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices. Human-Computer Interaction 5 145-190.
7. Schmandt, C. 1993. From desktop audio to mobile access: opportunities for voice in computing. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 4. H. R. Hartson and D. Hix, (Eds.), Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 251-283.
8. Shneiderman, B. 1983. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer 16 8, 57-69.