-
2
-
-
0000996163
-
-
C. Cutler, L. S. Finn, E. Poisson, and G. J. Sussmann, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1511 (1993).
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.47
, pp. 1511
-
-
Cutler, C.1
Finn, L.S.2
Poisson, E.3
Sussmann, G.J.4
-
6
-
-
0000317659
-
-
L. Blanchet, T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3515 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.74
, pp. 3515
-
-
Blanchet, L.1
Damour, T.2
Iyer, B.R.3
Will, C.M.4
Wiseman, A.G.5
-
9
-
-
21344431653
-
-
L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Class. Quantum Grav. 13, 575 (1996).
-
(1996)
Class. Quantum Grav.
, vol.13
, pp. 575
-
-
Blanchet, L.1
Iyer, B.R.2
Will, C.M.3
Wiseman, A.G.4
-
15
-
-
85037210411
-
-
The most accuracy-demanding case is the wave form emitted by a binary system made of a (Formula presented) neutron star and a (Formula presented) black hole
-
The most accuracy-demanding case is the wave form emitted by a binary system made of a (Formula presented) neutron star and a (Formula presented) black hole 1114.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
0001630137
-
-
in Gravitational Radiation, edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 59–144
-
C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. 2T. Damour, 294, 1355 (1982);in Gravitational Radiation, edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 59–144.
-
(1982)
C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. 2
, vol.294
, pp. 1355
-
-
Damour, T.1
-
19
-
-
85037231374
-
-
L. Blanchet (unpublished);L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and B. Joguet (in preparation);L. Blanchet, G. Faye, B. R. Iyer, B. Joguet, and B. Ponsot (work in progress);C. M. Will and M. E. Pati (work in progress);G. Schäfer and P. Jaranowski (work in progress).
-
-
-
Blanchet, L.1
Blanchet, L.2
Iyer, B.R.3
Joguet, B.4
Blanchet, L.5
Faye, G.6
Iyer, B.R.7
Joguet, B.8
Ponsot, B.9
Will, C.M.10
Pati, M.E.11
Schäfer, G.12
Jaranowski, P.13
-
26
-
-
85037224555
-
-
Note that we consistently label the successive approximants by the order in velocity. E.g. a 2PN-accurate object has the label 4
-
Note that we consistently label the successive approximants by the order in velocity. E.g. a 2PN-accurate object has the label 4.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
85037227880
-
-
E.g., if one factorized out the log factors in the flux function of Eq. (4.1) as in Eq. (4.5), (Formula presented)(Formula presented)then the corresponding coefficients (Formula presented) are given by (Formula presented). The (Formula presented) are as given by Eq. (4.9)
-
E.g., if one factorized out the log factors in the flux function of Eq. (4.1) as in Eq. (4.5), (Formula presented)(Formula presented)then the corresponding coefficients (Formula presented) are given by (Formula presented). The (Formula presented) are as given by Eq. (4.9).
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
85037243782
-
-
The problem of phase maximization was first considered by Schutz for the case of two wave forms which both have the same shape: B. F. Schutz, in The Detection of Gravitational Radiation, edited by D. Blair (Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989), pp. 406–427 (also see Ref
-
The problem of phase maximization was first considered by Schutz for the case of two wave forms which both have the same shape: B. F. Schutz, in The Detection of Gravitational Radiation, edited by D. Blair (Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989), pp. 406–427 (also see Ref. 38). Here we are addressing the problem of maximization over phase when the signal and the template wave forms belong to different post-Newtonian families.
-
-
-
|