How many things are there? A reply to Oliver and Beattie, Beattie and Oliver, Oliver and Beattie, and Oliver and Beattie

Conservation Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 571-574

  Goldstein, Paul Z ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b American Museum of Natural Histoiy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000593055     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96119.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bcattie, A. J., anU I. Oliver. 1994. Taxonomic minimalism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9=488-490.
2. Brower, A. V. Z. 1995. Reply to Heattie and Oliver. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:204.
3. Cohvcll, R. K., and J. A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London. B 345:101-118.
4. Karciva, P. 1993. No shortcuts in new maps. Nature 35:202-203.
5. Kremen, C, R. K. Cohvell, T. L. Erwin, D. D. Murphy, R. F. Noss, and
6. M. A. Sanjayan. 1993. Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 7:796-808.
7. Langreth, R. 1994. The world according to Dan Janzen. Popular Science Decemlx:r:78-82, 112-113-
8. Majer, J. D. 1983- Ants: bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, landuse, and land conservation. Environmental Management 7:375-383.
9. Nixon, K. C, and Q. D. Wheeler. 1992. Measures of phylogenetic diversity. Pages 216-234 in M. J. Novacek and Q. D. Wheeler, editors. Extinction and phytogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.
10. Noss, R. F. 1996. The naturalists are dying off. Conservation Biology 10:1-3.
11. Oliver, I., and A. J. Beattie. 1993. A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 7:562-568.
12. Oliver, I., and A. J. Beattie. 1994. A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Pages 133-136 in P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, and R. I. Vane-Wright, editors. Systematics and conservation evaluation. The Systematics Association. Special volume 50. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
13. Oliver, I., and A. J. Beattie. 1996. Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conservation Biology 10:99-109.
14. Prendergast, J. R., R. M. Quinn, J. H. Lawton, B. C. Eversham, and D. W. Gibbons. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategics. Nature 365:335-337.
15. Vane-Wright, R. I., C. J. Humphries, and P. H. Williams. 1991. What to protect?-Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55:235-254.
16. Wheeler, Q. D. 1990. Insect diversity and cladistic constraints. Annals of the Enomological Society of America 83:1031-1045.
17. Wheeler, Q. D. 1995. Systematics, the scientific basis for inventories of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 4:476-489.