Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1977, Pages 205-228

  Van Manen, Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000591355     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. APPLE, MICHAEL W. “The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict.” In Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists, edited by William Pinar. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 95-119.
2. BODE, BOYD H. “On curriculum construction.” Curriculum Theory Network 5, no. 1 (1975): 39-59. Reprinted from: Boyd H. Bode. Modern educational theories. New York: Macmillan, 1927.
3. CHOMSKY, NOAM. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1965.
4. CONNELLY, F. MICHAEL. “The functions of curriculum development.” Interchange 3, nos. 2-3 (1972): 161-77.
5. DANIELS, LEROI B. “What is the language of the practical?” Curriculum Theory Network 4, no. 4 (1975): 237-61.
6. DILTHEY, WILHELM. Gesammelte schrifte. Leipzig: Teubner, 1914.
7. Pattern and meaning in history, edited by Hans P. Rickman. London: Heinemann, 1962.
8. FREIRE, PAULO. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.
9. GADAMER, HANS-GEORG. Truth and method. New York: The Seabury Press, 1975.
10. HABERMAS, JURGEN. “Toward a theory of communicative competence.” In Recent sociology no. 2: Patterns of communicative behavior, edited by Hans Peter Dreitzel. New York: Macmillan, 1970, pp. 114-48.
11. Theory and practice. London: Heinemann, 1974.
12. HEIDEGGER, MARTIN. Being and time. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
13. HUEBNER, DWAYNE. “Curricular language and classroom meanings.” In Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists, edited by William Pinar. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 217-36.
14. HUME, DAVID. An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1955.
15. HYMES, DELL, ed. Reinventing anthropology. New York: Pantheon, 1973.
16. KLIEBARD, HERBERT M. “The rise of scientific curriculum making and its aftermath.” Curriculum Theory Network 5, no. 1 (1975): 27-38.
17. MACDONALD, JAMES B. “Curriculum and human interests.” In Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists, edited by William Pinar. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 283-94.
18. MCHUGH, PETER; RAFFEL, STANLEY; FOSS, DANIEL C.J AND BLUM, ALAN F. On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge 8c Kegan Paul, 1974.
19. O’NEILL, JOHN. Making sense together: An introduction to wild sociology. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
20. PALMER, RICHARD E. Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.
21. PARSONS, TALCOTT. The structure of social action. New York: The Free Press, 1949.
22. RADNITZKY, GERARD. Contemporary schools of metascience. Chicago: H. Regnery, 1972.
23. ROSZAK, THEODORE. The making of a counter culture. New York: Doubleday, 1969.
24. SCHUTZ, ALFRED. Collected papers, Volume I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
25. SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review 78, no. 1 (1969): 1-24.
26. “The practical: Arts of eclectic.” School Review 79, no. 4 (1971): 493-542
27. “The practical 3: Translation into curriculum.” School Review 81, no. 4 (1973): 501-22.
28. SHAULL, RICHARD. Foreword to Pedagogy of the oppressed, by Paulo Freire. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.
29. SHILS, EDWARD A., and FINCH, HENRY A., eds. Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, 111.: Free Press, 1949.
30. THOMAS, WILLIAM I. Social behavior and personality, edited by Edmund H. Volk-hart. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1951.
31. VAN MANEN, MAX J. “Toward a phenomenology of instruction.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta, 1973.
32. “An exploration of alternative research orientations in social education.” Theory and Research in Social Education 3, no. 1 (1975): 1-28.
33. WALKER, DECKER F. “The curriculum field in formation.” Curriculum Theory Network 4, no. 4 (1975): 263-80.
34. “Straining to lift ourselves.” Curriculum Theory Network 5, no. 1 (1975): 3-25.
35. WALKER, DECKER F., and SCHAFFARZICK, JON. “Comparing curricula.” Review of Educational Research 44, no. 1 (1974): 83-111.
36. WINCH, PETER. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.