-
6
-
-
0001668295
-
-
G.A. Swartzlander, Jr., D R. Andersen, J J. Regan, H. Yin and A E. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1583 (1991).
-
(1991)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.66
, pp. 1583
-
-
A, G.1
Andersen, D.R.2
Regan, J.J.3
Yin, H.4
Kaplan, A.E.5
-
7
-
-
84975561040
-
-
G R. Allan, S R. Skinner, D R. Andersen and A L. Smirl, Opt. Lett.16, 156 (1991).
-
(1991)
Opt. Lett.
, vol.16
, pp. 156
-
-
Allan, G.R.1
Skinner, S.R.2
Andersen, D.R.3
Smirl, A.L.4
-
9
-
-
0000369641
-
-
M. Taya, M C. Bashaw, M M. Fejer, M. Segev and G C. Valley, Phys. Rev. A52, 3095 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.52
, pp. 3095
-
-
Taya, M.1
Bashaw, M.C.2
Fejer, M.M.3
Segev, M.4
Valley, G.C.5
-
25
-
-
35949005183
-
-
G C. Valley, M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, M M. Fejer and M C. Bashaw, Phys. Rev. A50, R4457 (1994).
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.50
-
-
Valley, G.C.1
Segev, M.2
Crosignani, B.3
Yariv, A.4
Fejer, M.M.5
Bashaw, M.C.6
-
27
-
-
85035240609
-
-
This paper deals with the so-called steady-state photorefractive screening solitons, which, unlike the photovoltaic solitons discussed in Ref. 18, require more complicated boundary conditions. Nevertheless, the main physical effects are similar to the case of saturable nonlinearity
-
This paper deals with the so-called steady-state photorefractive screening solitons, which, unlike the photovoltaic solitons discussed in Ref. 18, require more complicated boundary conditions. Nevertheless, the main physical effects are similar to the case of saturable nonlinearity;
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
3342975405
-
-
see also, P.DiPorto and
-
see also M. Segev, G C. Valley, B. Crosignani, P.DiPorto and A. Yariv, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3211 (1994).
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.73
, pp. 3211
-
-
Segev, M.1
Valley, G.C.2
Crosignani, B.3
Yariv, A.4
-
30
-
-
84972916429
-
-
P. Roussignol, D. Ricard, J. Lukasik and C. Flytzanis, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 5 (1987);
-
(1987)
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
, vol.4
, pp. 5
-
-
Roussignol, P.1
Ricard, D.2
Lukasik, J.3
Flytzanis, C.4
-
31
-
-
21544459517
-
-
L H. Acioli, A.S.L. Gomes, J M. Hickmann and C.B. de Araujo, Appl. Phys. Lett.56, 2279 (1990);
-
(1990)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.56
, pp. 2279
-
-
Acioli, L.H.1
S, A.2
Hickmann, J.M.3
B, C.4
-
33
-
-
0028423057
-
-
B. Lawrence, M. Cha, W E. Torruellas, G I. Stegeman, S. Etemad, G. Baker and F. Kajzer, Appl. Phys. Lett.64, 2773 (1994);
-
(1994)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.64
, pp. 2773
-
-
Lawrence, B.1
Cha, M.2
Torruellas, W.E.3
Stegeman, G.I.4
Etemad, S.5
Baker, G.6
Kajzer, F.7
-
34
-
-
0028463824
-
-
B. Lawrence, W E. Torruellas, M. Cha, M L. Sundheimer, G I. Stegeman, J. Meth, S. Etemad and G. Baker, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 597 (1994).
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.73
, pp. 597
-
-
Lawrence, B.1
Torruellas, W.E.2
Cha, M.3
Sundheimer, M.L.4
Stegeman, G.I.5
Meth, J.6
Etemad, S.7
Baker, G.8
-
36
-
-
0011777510
-
-
T K. Gustafson, P L. Kelley, R Y. Chiao and R G. Brewer, Appl. Phys. Lett.12, 165 (1968);
-
(1968)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.12
, pp. 165
-
-
Gustafson, T.K.1
Kelley, P.L.2
Chiao, R.Y.3
Brewer, R.G.4
-
46
-
-
85035246048
-
-
We note that the definition of the renormalized momentum given in Eq. (8) differs by the sign in front of the integral from that used in Ref. 26
-
We note that the definition of the renormalized momentum given in Eq. (8) differs by the sign in front of the integral from that used in Ref. 26.
-
-
-
|