Solvent effect on rotational motion of perchlorate ion

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 102, Issue 16, 1998, Pages 2995-3002

  Hosoi, Haruko ^a   Masuda, Yuichi ^a  

^a OCHANOMIZU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000568129     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp972638b     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Kay, P. L. Water: A Comprehensive Treatise, Franks, F. ed.; Prenum: New York, 1973, Chapter 4.
2. Wolynes, P. G. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1980, 31, 345.
3. (a) Nakahara, M.; Török, T.; Takisawa, N.; Osugi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 5145.
4. (b) Nakahara, M.; Osugi, J.; Takisawa, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 3582.
5. (c) Takisawa, N.; Osugi, J.; Nakahara, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77, 4717.
6. (d) Takisawa, N.; Osugi, J.; Nakahara, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 2591.
7. (e) Ibuki, K.; Nakahara, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3026.
8. (a) James, D.; Frost, R. L. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1977, 64, 48.
9. (b) Whittle, M.; Clarke, J. H. R. Mol. Phys. 1981, 44, 1435.
10. Kato, T.; Umemura, J.; Takenaka, T. Mol. Phys. 1978, 36, 621.
11. Nicolas, A. M. de P.; Wasylishen, R. E. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 951.
12. (a) Adachi, A.; Kiyoyama, H.; Nakahara, M.; Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H.; Shimizu, A.; Taniguchi, Y. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 392.
13. (b) Nakahara, M.; Adachi, A.; Kiyoyama, H.; Shimizu, A.; Taniguchi, Y.; Masuda, Y. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6179.
14. Nicolas, A. M. de P.; Wasylishen, R. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5446.
15. Masuda, Y.; Sano, M.; Yamatera, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 3086.
16. Perrin, C. L.; Gipe, R. K. Science 1987, 238, 1393.
17. Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 5339.
18. Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 3425.
19. Madden, D. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1980, 31, 523.
20. Maroncelli, M. J. Mol. Liq. 1993, 57, 1.
21. Barbara, P. F.; Jarzeba, W. Adv. Photochem. 1990, 15, 1
22. Nakahara, M.; Emi, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 5418.
23. Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1985, 81, 127.
24. Holtz, M. Progr. Nucl. Magn. Spectrosc. 1986, 18, 327.
25. Abragam, A. The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism; Oxford: London, 1961; Chapter 8.
26. Harrey, J. S. M. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1965, 285, 581.
27. Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. Chem. Lett. 1988, 171.
28. Ibuki, K.; Nakahara, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 90, 386.
29. (a) Kivelson, D.; Kowert, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 3071.
30. (b) Boeré, R. J.; Kidd, G. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 1982, 13, 319.
31. Evans, G. T.; Kivelson, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 385.
32. (a) Wasylishen, R. E.; Pettitt, B. A. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 2564.
33. (b) Wasylishen, R. E.; Pettitt, B. A.; Danchura, W. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 3602.
34. (c) Bartoli, F. J.; Litovitz, T. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 404.
35. 2r vs η/T for some solvents over a wide temperature range also curved downward with decreasing η/T and gave a negligibly small or no zero-intercept.
36. The C values will be smaller if one considers a zero-intercept.
37. (a) Felderhof, B. U. Mol. Phys. 1983, 48, 1269.
38. (b) Felderhof, B. U. Mol. Phys. 1983, 48, 1283.
39. (a) Hubbard, J.; Onsager, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 4850.
40. (b) Hubbard, J. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 1649.
41. (a) Alavi, D. S.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 6196.
42. (b) Hartman, R. S.; Alavi, D. S.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 7872.
43. (c) Hartman, R. S.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1386.
44. Nee, T. W.; Zwanzig, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 6353
45. Nakahara, M.; Ibuki, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 4654.
46. Bauer, D. R.; Brauman, J. I.; Pecora, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6840.
47. Horng, M.-L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 1030 and references therein.
48. Wakai, C.; Nakahara, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 8347.
49. Waldeck, D. H. Chem. Res. 1991, 91, 415 and references therein.
50. (a) Weaver, M. J.; McManis, G. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 294.
51. (b) Marroncelli, M.; MacInnis, J.; Fleming, G. R. Science 1989, 243, 1674 and references therein.
52. (a) Grote, R. F.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 2715.
53. (b) Grote, R. F.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 4465.
54. α dependence of the rotational relaxation times, particularly of nonpolar molecules has often been discussed with quasi-hydrodynamic models considering the volume of a solvent molecule relative to that of solute; e.g., the Gierer-Wirtz microviscosity theory (Z. Naturforsch. A 1953, 8, 532) and the Dote-Kivelson-Schwartz free space model (J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2169). Application of these models to the perchlorate rotation showed quite a poor correlation between the calculated and the observed rotational relaxation times in the solvents used in the present study.
55. α dependence of the rotational relaxation times, particularly of nonpolar molecules has often been discussed with quasi-hydrodynamic models considering the volume of a solvent molecule relative to that of solute; e.g., the Gierer-Wirtz microviscosity theory (Z. Naturforsch. A 1953, 8, 532) and the Dote-Kivelson-Schwartz free space model (J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2169). Application of these models to the perchlorate rotation showed quite a poor correlation between the calculated and the observed rotational relaxation times in the solvents used in the present study.
56. Such an anomaly in alcohols has not been reported for nitrate ion (ref 16), which might be attributed to a slightly larger negative charge on the oxygens of the nitrate ion and/or its nonspherical shape. However, the main reason for the difference in the feature of the plots for the nitrate and the perchlorate ion is probably the choice of solvents; that is, the 12, values of the nitrate ion were given only in water and acetonitrile other than alcohols.
57. Barthel, J.; Bachhuber, K.; Hetzenauer, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 165, 369.
58. Turq, P.; Barthel, J.; Chemla, M. Transport, Relaxation, and Kinetic Processes in Electrolyte Solutions; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992; Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Vol. 57, Chapter VII.
59. (a) Weaver, M. J.; McManis, G. E.; Jarzeba, W.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 1715.
60. (b) McManis, G. E.; Golovin, M. N.; Weaver, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 6563.
61. Gutmann, V. Donor and Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions; Plenum: New York, 1978; Chapter 2.
62. Ibuki, K.; Nakahara, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 2776.
63. The stick boundary condition was assumed for the calculation. If one applies the perfect slip boundary, then a similar linear relation is obtained (the slope is 0.88).
64. (a) Edward, J. T. J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47, 261.
65. (b) Frank, H. S. Chemical Physics of Ionic Solutions; Conway, B. E., Barradas, R. G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1966; p 60.
66. Horng, M, -L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 1030.
67. The hydrodynamic friction for the rotation of a nonspherical molecule remains even when the perfect slip boundary condition is assumed. (Hu, C.-M.; Zwanzig, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60, 4354).