Visualization in detection of intrusions and misuse in large scale networks

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation

Volumn 2000-July, Issue , 2000, Pages 294-299

  Erbacher, Robert F ^a   Frincke, Deborah ^b  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

^b University of Idaho   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTRUSION DETECTION; NETWORK SECURITY;

COMMERCIAL SECTOR; INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS; LARGE-SCALE NETWORK; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 0000548928     PISSN: 10939547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IV.2000.859771     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Picciotto, J., “The Design of an Effective Auditing System,”Technical report, 1987.
2. D. Zerkle et al. “A Data-Mining Analysis of RTID Alanns”, Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, Sept 1999.
3. Markus Gross, Visual Computing, The Integration of Computer Graphics, Visual Perception and Imaging, Springer-Verlag,1994.
4. William R. Hendee and Peter N.T. Wells, ThePerception of Visualinformation,Springer-Verlag. 1994.
5. Polla, D., J. McConnell, T. Johnson, J. Marconi, D. Tobin, and D. Frincke, “A Framework for Cooperative Intrusion Detection,” 21st National Informution Systems Security Conference, pp. 361-373, October 1998.
6. Snapp, S. et al., “DIDS (Distributed Intrusion Detection System) Motivation, Architecture and An Early Prototype,” National Information Systems Security Conference, 1991,
7. C. KOand D. Frincke and T. Goan et al., “Analysis of an Algorithm for Distributed Recognition and Accountability,” ACM conference on Computer and CommunicationSecurity, VI(1), 1993.
8. Vert, G., J. McConnell, and D. Frincke. “Towards a Mathematical Model for Intrusion,” 2Is1 National Information Systems Security Conference, pp. 329-337, October 1998.
9. Georges Grinstein, “Workshop on Information Exploration Shootout Project and Benchmark Data Sets: Evaluating How Visualization does in Analyzing Real-World Data Analysis Problems,”Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization ‘97Conference, IEEE omputer Society Press, Phoenix, AZ, 1997, pp. 51 1-513.
10. [IO] Richard Becker, Stephen Eick, and Allan Wilks. Graphical methods to analyze network data. In ZEEE International Conference on Communications ICC ‘93 Proceedings, pages 946-95, Geneva, Switzerland,May 1993.
11. [1I] Taosong He and StephenG. Eick. Constructing Interactive Visual Network Interfaces. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 3(2)47-57, April-June 1998.
12. [I21Kenneth Cox, Stephen Eick, and Taosong He. 3D geographic network displays. ACM Sigmod Record, 25(4):50.
13. Robert F. Erbacher, “Visual Assistance for Concurrent Processing,” University of Massachusetts at Lowell Doctoral Dissertation (1998 CS-3),Lowell, MA 01854.
14. Richard Becker, Stephen Eick, and Allan Wilks, “Visualizing Network Data,” Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision To Think, Stuard Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman, editors, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1999, pp. 215-227.
15. [IS] Tim Bray, “Measuring the Web,” Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision To Think, Stuard Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman, editors, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1999, pp. 469-492.
16. [I61 Robert van Liere, Jurriaan Mulder and Jack van Wijk., “Computational Steering,” Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 12, no. 5, 1997.
17. M. Sarkar and M. Brown, “Graphical Fisheye Views,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 73-84, 1994.
18. Jonathon C. Roberts, “On Encouraging Multiple Views for Visualization,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualization, pages 8-14, London, England, July 29-31, 1998.