Explanation

Cladistics

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 211-218

  Farris, James S ^a   Källersjö, Mari ^a   Albert, Victor A ^b   Allard, Marc ^c   Anderberg, Arne ^d   Bowditch, Brunella ^e   Bult, Carol ^f   Carpenter, James M ^g   Crowe, Timothy M ^h   De Laet, Jan ⁱ   Fitzhugh, Kirk ^j   Frost, Darryl ^g   Goloboff, Pablo ^k   Humphries, Christopher J ^l   Jondelius, Ulf ^d   Judd, Darlene ^m   Karis, Per Ola ^d   Lipscomb, Diana ^c   Luckow, Melissa ⁿ   Mindell, David ^o   Muona, Jyrki ^p   Nixon, Kevin ⁿ   Presch, William ^q   Seberg, Ole ^r   Siddall, Mark E ^s   Struwe, Lena ^b   Tehler, Anders ^t   Wenzel, John ^u   Wheeler, Quentin ⁿ   Wheeler, Ward ^g   more..

^a Molekylarsystematiska Laboratoriet   (Sweden)

^b NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Sektionen för fanerogambotanik Naturhistoriska riksmuseet Box 50007 S 104 05 Stockholm Sweden ^*

^e Trinity College   (United States)

^f J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^j Los Angeles County Museum   (United States)

^k UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE TUCUMÁN   (Argentina)

^l DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^m TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^q CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^s VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (United States)

^t STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^u OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000548583     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0748-3007(95)90012-8     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Methods for Computing Wagner Trees
2. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis
3. Three-taxon transformation in phylogenetic inference: Ambiguity and distortion as regards explanatory power
4. REPLY
5. Information content and fractional weight of three-item statements
6. Three-taxon statements: A more precise use of parsimony?
7. CHARACTER OPTIMIZATION AND WEIGHTING: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE STANDARD AND THREE-TAXON APPROACHES TO PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE