Using online databases to form subject collections for informetric analyses

Scientometrics

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 647-667

  Wilson, Concepción S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000544028     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02459618     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. BOOKSTEIN, A. (1990), Informetric distributions, part II: Resilience to ambiguity, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 376-386.
2. BRADFORD, S. C. (1953), Documentation, 2nd. ed., London.
3. DIALOG (1998), DIALINDEX, [http://library.dialog.com/pktguide/dindex.html], 27 September, 1998.
4. EGGHE, L., RAVICHANDRA RAO, I. K. (1992), Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25(1), 5-46.
5. EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (1990), Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Amsterdam.
6. NELSON, M. J., TAGUE, J. M. (1985), Split size-rank models for the distribution of index terms, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(5), 283-296.
7. OLUIC-VUKOVIC, V. (1992), Journal productivity distribution: Quantitative study of dynamic behavior, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 412-421.
8. WILSON, C. S. (1995), The formation of subject literature collections for bibliometric analysis: The case of Bradford's Law of Scattering, PhD. Dissertation, School of Information, Library and archive Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
9. WILSON, C. S. (1998), Defining subject collections for informetric analyses: The effect of varying the subject aboutness level, Scientometrics, 41 (1-2), 209-223.