Ellipsometric determination of universal critical adsorption scaling functions

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 532-541

  Carpenter, J H ^a   Cho, J J ^a   Law, B M ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ELLIPSOMETRY; LIQUIDS;

BINARY-LIQUID MIXTURES; CRITICAL ADSORPTION; ELLIPSOMETRIC DATA; SCALING FUNCTIONS; SURFACE FIELD; UNIVERSAL SCALING;

BINARY MIXTURES;

EID: 0000534189     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.532     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. B. M. Law, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2760 (1993).
2. J.-M. Petit, B. M. Law, and D. Beysens, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 202, 441 (1998)
3. B. M. Law, J.-M. Petit, and D. Beysens, Phys. Rev. E 57, 5782 (1998).
4. V. Ganesan and H. Brenner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 578 (1998).
5. M. E. Fisher and P.-G. de Gennes, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. B 287, 207 (1978).
6. M. E. Fisher and J.-H. Chen, J. Phys. (Paris) 46, 1645 (1985).
7. H. W. Diehl, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1986), Vol. 10.
8. A. Kumar, H. R. Krishnamurthy, and E. S. R. Gopal, Phys. Rep. 98, 57 (1983).
9. U. Ritschel and P. Czerner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3645 (1996)
10. P. Czerner and U. Ritschel, Physica A 237, 240 (1997)
11. A. Ciach and U. Ritschel, Nucl. Phys. B 489, 653 (1997)
12. A. Ciach, A. Maciolek, and J. Stecki, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5913 (1998).
13. N. S. Desai, S. Peach, and C. Franck, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4129 (1995).
14. A. J. Liu and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7202 (1989).
15. H. W. Diehl and M. Smock, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5841 (1993)
16. Phys. Rev. BH. W. DiehlM. Smock48, 6470(E) (1993).
17. M. Smock, H. W. Diehl, and D. P. Landau, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 98, 486 (1994).
18. S. Blümel and G. H. Findenegg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 447 (1985).
19. D. Beysens and S. Leibler, J. Phys. (France) Lett. 43, L133 (1982).
20. C. Franck and S. E. Schnatterly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 763 (1982)
21. J. A. Dixon, M. Schlossman, X.-L. Wu, and C. Franck, Phys. Rev. B 31, 1509 (1985)
22. Phys. Rev. BM. Schlossman, X. L. Wu, and C. Franck, 31, 1478 (1985).
23. D. Beaglehole, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 3366 (1980)
24. J. Chem. Phys.D. Beaglehole75, 1544 (1981)
25. D. BeagleholePhys. Lett. 91A, 237 (1982)
26. D. BeagleholeJ. Phys. Chem. 87, 4749 (1983).
27. B. Heidel and G. H. Findenegg, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 6575 (1984)
28. B. HeidelG. H. FindeneggJ. Chem. Phys. 87, 706 (1987).
29. J. W. Schmidt and M. R. Moldover, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1829 (1985)
30. J. Chem. Phys.J. W. Schmidt, 85, 3631 (1986).
31. H. Zhao, A. Penninckx-Sans, L.-T. Lee, D. Beysens, and G. Jannink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1977 (1995).
32. J. R. Howse, J. Bowers, E. Manzanares-Papayanopoulos, I. A. McLure, and R. Steitz, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5577 (1999).
33. D. S. P. Smith and B. M. Law, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2727 (1996).
34. D. S. P. Smith, B. M. Law, M. Smock, and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. E 55, 620 (1997).
35. G. Flöter and S. Dietrich, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 97, 213 (1995).
36. J. H. Carpenter, B. M. Law, and D. S. P. Smith, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5655 (1999).
37. M. Krech, The Casimir Effect in Critical Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), and references therein.
38. S. Gnutzmann and U. Ritschel, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 96, 391 (1995).
39. H. B. Tarko and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 926 (1973).
40. A. J. Liu and M. E. Fisher, Physica A 156, 35 (1989).
41. C. Ruge, P. Zhu, and F. Wagner, Physica A 209, 431 (1994).
42. T. W. Burkhardt and H. W. Diehl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3894 (1994).
43. Note that the ratio (Formula presented) [Eq. (9)] corrects a sign error in the corresponding expression in 11.
44. D. Beaglehole, in Fluid Interfacial Phenomena, edited by C. A. Croxton (Wiley, New York, 1986).
45. V. L. Kuzmin and V. P. Romanov, Phys. Rev. E 49, 2949 (1994).
46. J. Lekner, Theory of Reflection (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987).
47. P. K. L. Drude, The Theory of Optics (Dover, New York, 1959), p. 292.
48. B. M. Law and D. Beaglehole, J. Phys. D 14, 115 (1981).
49. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principle of Optics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980), Sec. 1.6.
50. R. F. Kayser, Phys. Rev. B 34, 3254 (1986).
51. D. S. P. Smith and B. M. Law, Phys. Rev. E 52, 580 (1995).
52. The values given in Eqs. (17) and (18) are from 24 deduced using the procedure given in 22.
53. B. Widom, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13 190 (1996).
54. C. L. Caylor, B. M. Law, P. Senanayake, V. L. Kuzmin, V. P. Romanov, and S. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4441 (1997).
55. A. Mukhopadhyay, C. L. Caylor, and B. M. Law (unpublished).
56. T. J. Sluckin, Mol. Phys. 47, 267 (1982)
57. Mol. Phys.T. J. Sluckin43, 817 (1981).
58. J.-P. Carton and L. Leibler, J. Phys. (France) 51, 1683 (1990).
59. Note that Widom 41 uses a slightly different terminology from that used here. In our terminology, dipolar molecules possess a permanent dipole moment without any amphiphilic properties; thus a particular end of the molecule has no preference for being in a particular phase. Widom calls such molecules nematic. Our amphiphilic molecules whose ends possess a preference for being in a particular phase are called dipolar by Widom.