Delay time measurements in a diffraction experiment: A case of optical tunneling

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 3593-3597

  Mugnai, D ^b,c   Ranfagni, A ^b,c   Schulman, L S ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b IFAC CNR   (Italy)

^c CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000528230     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.3593     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. M. Schaffner and G. Toraldo di Francia, Il Nuovo Cimento, 6, 125 (1949).
2. G. Toraldo di Francia, La Diffrazione della Luce, (Boringhieri, Torino 1948), p. 112.
3. R. Landauer, Nature (London)365, 692, (1993).
4. Julian Brown, New Sci. n.1971, 26 (1995).
5. A. Enders and G. Nimtz, J. Phys. (France) I2, 1693 (1992);
6. A. Enders and G. Nimtz, J. Phys. (France) I3, 1089 (1993).
7. A M. Steinberg, P G. Kwiat, R Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 708 (1993).
8. Ch. Spielman, R. Szipöcs, A. Stingl and F. Krausz, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 2308 (1994).
9. A. Ranfagni, P. Fabeni, G P. Pazzi and D. Mugnai, Phys. Rev. E48, 1453 (1993).
10. G. Nimtz, A. Enders and H. Spieker, J. Phys. (France) I4, 565 (1994);
11. G. Nimtz, J. Phys. (France) I4, 1817 (1994).
12. A M. Steinberg, J. Phys. (France) I4, 1813 (1994).
13. W. Heitmann and G. Nimtz, Phys. Lett. A196, 154 (1994).
14. W. Yun-ping and Z. Dian-lin, Phys. Rev. A52, 2597 (1995).
15. A. Ranfagni and D. Mugnai, Phys. Rev. E52, 1128 (1995).
16. D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni, R. Ruggeri and A. Agresti, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 259 (1992).
17. A M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2405 (1995).
18. D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni, R. Ruggeri, A, Agresti and E. Recami, Phys. Lett. A209, 227 (1995).
19. F.E. Terman and J.M. Pettit, Electronic Measurements, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1952), p. 428.
20. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B27, 6178 (1983).
21. A. Ranfagni, D. Mugnai, P. Fabeni and G P. Pazzi, Appl. Phys. Lett.58, 774 (1991).
22. Th. Martin and R. Landauer, Phys. Rev. A45, 2611 (1992).
23. We note that by putting n=1 in Eq. (6) we obtain, as expected, the same expression of Eq. (2.6) as in Ref. 18 as well as Eq. (14a) in Ref. 20 apart from a misprint.
24. J B. Keller, J. Opt. Soc. Am.52, 116 (1962).
25. D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni, R. Ruggeri and A. Agresti, Phys. Rev. E50, 790 (1994).
26. The group delay, or phase-time delay, as given by the derivative of the dephasing Δφ [as given by Eqs. (4) and (6)] with respect to the angular frequency ω, in both allowed and forbidden processes, is widely accepted (see Refs. 8, 11, 15, 18, 20), since the work by T.E. Hartman [J. Appl. Phys.33, 3427 (1962)] based on the stationary phase approximation. Some authors expressed their criticism of the validity of such a procedure, as such as F.E. Low and P.F. Mende, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)210, 380 (1991). The phase-time model, however, appears to be thus far the most suitable to interpret the experimental results.
27. See Ref. 2, pp. 411–422.
28. R S. Dumont and T.L. Marchioro, II, Phys. Rev. A47, 85 (1993).
29. M S. Marinov and B. Segev (unpublished).