Therapists’ views of treatment alliance and collaboration in therapy

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 405-423

  Hatcher, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000519903     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503309912331332831     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agnew-Davies, R., Stiles, W. B., Hardy, G. E., Barkham, M., and Shapiro, D. A. (1998). Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 155-172.
2. Alexander, L. B., and Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg and W. M. Pinsoff (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325-366). New York: Guilford.
3. Bachelor, A. (1991). Comparison and relation to outcome of diverse dimensions of the helping alliance as seen by client and therapist. Psychotherapy, 28, 534-539.
4. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 262-260.
5. Bordin, E. S. (1980). Of human bonds that bind or free. Presidential address given at the 1980 meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Pacific Grove, CA.
6. Buja, A., and Eyuboglu, N. (1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 509-540.
7. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
8. Frieswyk, S. H., Gabbard, G. O., Horowitz, L., Allen, J. G., Colson, D. B., Newsom, G. E. and Coyne, L. (1994). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychoanalytic therapy with borderline patients. In A. O. Horvath and L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance. Theory, research and practice (pp. 199-224). New York: Wiley.
9. Gaston, L. (1991). Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales—patient version. Psychological Assessment, 3, 68-74.
10. Gaston, L., and Marmar, C. R. (1991). Manual of California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS). Unpublished manuscript.
11. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Second edition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
12. Hatcher R. L., and Barends, A. W. (1996). Patients’ view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1326-1336.
13. Hatcher, R. L., Barends, A., Hansell, J., and Gutfreund, M. J. (1995). Patients’ and therapists’ shared and unique views of the therapeutic alliance: An investigation using confirmatory factor analysis in a nested design. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 636-643.
14. Henry, W. P.; Schacht, T. E.; Strupp, H. H.; Butler, S. F., and Binder, J. L. (1993). Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: Mediators of therapists’ responses to training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 441-447.
15. Hill, C.; Thompson, J.; Cogar, M. C., and Denman, D. W. (1993). Beneath the surface of long-term therapy: Therapist and client reports of their own and each other’s covert processes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 278-287.
16. Horvath, A. O. (1984). Working Alliance Inventory—Form T. Unpublished questionnaire,. © A. O. Horvath, 1981, 1984.
17. Horvath, A. O. (1994). Research on the alliance. In A. O. Horvath and L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice. (pp. 259-286). New York: Wiley.
18. Horvath, A. O., and Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223-233.
19. Horvath, A. O., and Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 561-573.
20. Horvath, A. O. and Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139-149.
21. Kiers, H. A. L, (1990). SCA, a program for simultaneous components analysis of variables measured in two or more populations. Groningen, the Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA.
22. Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. New York: Routledge.
23. Mahoney, M. J. (1995). The modern psychotherapist and the future of psychotherapy. In B. Bongar and L. E. Beutler (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy: Theory and practice (pp. 474-488). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Marziali, E. (1984). Three viewpoints on the therapeutic alliance: Similarities, differences, and associations with psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease-, 172, 417-423
25. Millsap, R. E. and Meredith, W. (1988). Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychomelrika, 53, 123-134.
26. O’Malley, S. S., Suh, C. S., Strupp, H. H. (1983). The Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Process Scale: A report on the scale development and a process-outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 581-586.
27. Rennie, D. L. (1994). Clients’ deference in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 427-437.
28. Stiles, W. B., Agnew-Davies, R., Hardy, G. E., Barkham, M., and Shapiro, D. A. (1998). Relations of the alliance with psychotherapy outcome: Findings in the second Sheffield psychotherapy project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 791-802.
29. Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1986). Rotation to perfect congruence and the cross-validation of component weights across populations. Midtivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 41-61; 262-266.